Emac's Stock Watch | Fox Business
  • December 3, 2008 10:06 AM EST by Elizabeth MacDonald

    US Banks Lag Europe in Executive-Bonus Cuts

    At a time when the US taxpayer is bailing out Wall Street with record capital injections, US firms lag European banks when it comes to executives forgoing bonuses.

    UBS, Deutsche Bank and Barclays PLC have either pulled bonuses for top executives, or executives there have voluntarily forfeited them.

    In the U.S., only New York-based Goldman Sachs Group is pulling bonuses for top executives. Goldman's chief executive Lloyd Blankfein and six deputies will forgo bonuses. Four top executives at Goldman got more than $250 mn in bonuses last year.

    There is no word yet whether top executives at Citigroup (C), Morgan Stanley (MS), JPMorgan Chase (JPM) and Merrill Lynch (MER) will voluntarily give up their bonuses, as Wall Street workers are being laid off in record numbers, as Bloomberg terminals are getting yanked from desks, as workers are being told to pay for their own business expenses.

    Compensation experts expect that Wall Street firms will increasingly curtail executive cash bonuses and instead pay bonuses in the form of company stock. And the Troubled Asset Relief Program ostensibly is supposed to restrict executive pay at banks that access its funds.

    However, the Government Accountability Office says in a new report that the US Treasury has yet to address "critical issues" in its $700 bn bailout, including how officials are ensuring that the banks getting TARP funds are complying with new executive pay limits. 

    Merrill Lynch Bonus Cuts

    Merrill Lynch is the latest firm to slash bonuses across the board on average 50%, still less than the average estimated 70% bonus cut for all firms on the Street. However, there is still no word whether Merrill's top managers will voluntarily forgo their bonuses. John Thain got a $15 mn bonus when he joined Merrill a year ago.

    The Bonus Controversy

    The bonus controversy comes amidst historic bailouts of financial companies around the world and under heightened scrutiny from politicians and taxpayers. Bankers' bonuses have been blamed for causing the financial crisis, as the payouts were blamed for creating a short-term focus on fast profits and an environment of heightened risk, instead of long-term stability.

    Wall Street firms have vowed not to use their recent $125 bn cash infusion from the US government to pay bankers' bonuses.

    Elected Officials Scrutinize Bonuses

    Congress is supposedly taking a hard look at Wall Street executive bonuses.

    New York State Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo has demanded detailed information about bonuses and pay, sending letters to nine Wall Street firms that received $125 bn in taxpayer funding as part of the U.S. Treasury Department's Troubled Asset Relief Program.

    Dissatisfied with Bank of America's disclosures, Cuomo has also subpoenaed the bank for a list of executives who received a bonus of more than $250,000 over the past two years, The Wall Street Journal reports. Cuomo is attempting to ensure that none of the $125 bn the banks have received from TARP will be used on executive pay.

    Already, Goldman Sachs Group, Bank of America and Wells Fargo have told Congress that none of the total of $75 bn they have received from US taxpayers is being used to pay salaries or bonuses.

    Kenneth D. Lewis, Bank of America's chief executive, received $4.25 mn in non-equity cash bonuses in 2007, along with another $4.25 mn in restricted stock. Reports indicate that Lewis's 2007 payout is less than half of his target bonus of $18.5 mn in cash and restricted stock, indicating the bank "significantly missed" its main financial goals for that year.

    Europe Takes the Lead

    In Europe, top executives at the Swiss bank UBS yanked bonuses for chief executive Marcel Rohner and 11 other top executives. Executives have given back an estimated $58.3 mn in bonuses after a record $48.6 bn of write-downs at UBS, more than any other bank in Europe, forced it to take $59.2 bn in aid from the state.

    Former chairman Marcel Ospel and two former colleagues on the board offered to forgo $27.5 mn in pay. Former CEO Peter Wuffli, who left the bank last year, waived his $1 mn payout.

    UBS also was first out of the box with a new plan to claw back executive bonuses in the years after they are awarded. The bonus restrictions include a new plan where executives will get as much as a third of the bonus paid out immediately, with the remaining two-thirds put into an escrow account for at least a year, subject to reductions if there is a loss at the executives' divisions or the whole bank.  

    Share-based bonuses will not vest for three years and executives will be "obliged to hold three quarters of their vested shares (after paying taxes) for several more years," UBS disclosed.  

    Deutsche Bank kicked off the bonus forfeiture trend, in October, as it slashed bonuses for its board. Deutsche Bank's Josef Ackerman, the highest-paid executive of Germany's top 30 companies, was among the execs there who voluntarily waived a year-end bonus. Deutsche's investment banking chiefs Anshu Jain, Michael Cohrs and members of the bank's management and supervisory boards also forfeited their bonuses for this year.

    London-based Barclays PLC, which needed $10.5 bn in new capital to survive, said it won't pay annual bonuses to top executives, including chief executive officer John Varley. Barclays president and investment banking chief Robert Diamond, consumer bank head Frits Seegers and finance director Chris Lucas will forgo their 2008 bonuses. Diamond got a $9.75 mn bonus last year, reports indicate.

    Citigroup Banker Says Bonus Forfeitures Won't Stop Losses

    During its crisis in the 90s, Japan's 17 largest banks cut salaries and bonuses after a government bailout, reports indicate.

    However, Citigroup chairman Win Bischoff said changing bankers' pay to include more stock and longer-term awards will fail to stop the industry racking up losses, Bloomberg reports.

    "By itself, more share and retention-based compensation is not the magic bullet because it certainly didn't stop us from running up very large losses," Bischoff, 67, said recently at a Swiss- American Chamber of Commerce event in Zurich, Bloomberg reports.

    Citigroup's senior managers get about half their total compensation in shares and are prohibited from selling more than 25% of the stock awarded, Bloomberg notes, adding that the U.S. government will also have a say over pay at Citigroup after it agreed to give the New York-based bank a $20 bn cash injection.

    "You here in Switzerland, and particularly our friends at UBS, have done a lot of good work in this area," when it comes to curtailing bonuses, Bloomberg quotes Bischoff. "However, it's not the only answer."

joebhed

My God, Elizabeth, be careful. On these pages we are supposed to defend not only capitalism itself, but, you know, American capitalism. So, to be getting all skweegee about those snobby Europeans who really do not understand our rugged, competitive business style is getting close to blasphemy. I mean, ain't they socialists over there? The story is laid out in regard to taxpayer bailouts of banks, or more directly, bankers. And THAT right there is getting close enough to socialism for a lot of us. You lay out the difference in CEO pay and bonuses and the next thing you know somebody will be questioning dividends. I'm sorry to point out, Elizabeth, that the real difference between the approaches across the pond are much more grand and much more striking. Take for instance the right of the taxpayers to demand ANYTHING. The way it worked in Europe is that the bankers did not get any government guarantee at all, let alone a real loan, without giving up whatever the government says is needed to make the public investment worthwhile. You know soundness and security from the taxpayers' perspective. Over here we can ONLY even talk about ANY type of give-back by the American bankers in regard to the $700 BILLION Treasury position. The FED's $3 TRILLION contribution to the hoarding American banks is not subject to any rule or regulation that the government may want to impart for security and soundness purposes. CEO pay or public equity or dividends. The FED's magic-carpet is made up of one hand that feeds the bankers and one hand that picks the taxpayers' pockets. As one taxpayer, I am glad to know that you care.

December 4, 2008 at 6:41 pm

jinrui

The funniest part is while the wall street got bailed out and still got bonus. If they can afford to pay bonus with their own money, I don't have any question. But this is tax payers' money. And things are even better: Bank of America, who bought Merrill Lynch, will give retention bonus to Merrill Lynch's employee who decided to stay at the merged company. And B of A is also a company received 25 billion tax payer's money. Isn't that a kind of corruption? To get the bail-out, they even don't need to show turnaround business plan?

December 4, 2008 at 1:47 am

Charles Shepherd

I guess I'm confused. I only received a bonus when my Company is in the "black". I guess the Financial Community does not operate under the same principle. This quote by the illustrious Homer Simpson sums up the what the Executives and the Politicians are doing... Homer: "If you really want something in this life, you have to work for it --Now quiet, they're about to announce the lottery numbers!" It appears we are just buying lottery tickets off Wall Street with the hopes of a pay-back. Charles Shepherd Summerville, SC

December 3, 2008 at 12:02 pm

Lindon Endsley

I am a very conservative person BUT when I person is not the owner/founder of a company there ia no way his compensation should reach into 10s of million dollars. As these recent developments in the economy show these guys aren't a heck of a lot better at their job than the guy at my credit union who has made me money over the last 14 months. When a person can lose billions of my (the small investors) money and then make a bonus of 20 to 100 million there is something seriously wrong with the system. As a owner of a small business I believe that executive compensation should be tied to the profit that executive makes for his shareholders. Boards of directors, normally primarially composed of other high paid executives, should not be the primary arbitor of exectutive pay, shareholders should do that job. No one who is not a primary owner of a company deserves to make more than a couple million dollars salary and more than the percentage of increase in profit above his salary. We have developed a new feudalism with regard to money and these high paid executies are the new lords.

December 3, 2008 at 11:55 am

about this blog

  • Elizabeth MacDonald is the stocks editor for Fox Business Network. She is recognized as one of the top prize-winning business journalists in the country, and has received 14 awards, including the top prize in business journalism, the Gerald Loeb Award for Distinguished Business Journalism, and the Newswomen's Club of New York Front Page Award for Excellence in Investigative Journalism.

most popular posts