about this blog
- Elizabeth MacDonald is the stocks editor for Fox Business Network. She is recognized as one of the top prize-winning business journalists in the country, and has received 14 awards, including the top prize in business journalism, the Gerald Loeb Award for Distinguished Business Journalism, and the Newswomen's Club of New York Front Page Award for Excellence in Investigative Journalism.
most popular posts
-
- There are no viewed posts at this time.
Matt
Right On, I did the same exercise the other day at the SEC edgar web site, Since I have not been in the market, I have had no reason to evaluate GE's financial statements until this weekend. I felt like Rip Van Winkle waking up to a balance sheet from Hell. This is worse ratings than they gave to mortgage backed securities. I feel GE will go down unless directly funded by the Fed, with the commercial paper market falling 100 billion a week, and GE's hundreds of billions in short term funding, GE's new 12 or 15 billion in new capital should last about 1 week. The good news is that 28 percent of the commercial paper market matures in the next 7 days, and that the US borrowers actually were able to roll about 300 billion last week. The bad news is that the only money in the US will be either from banks or directly from the Fed, which will be deciding which US companies do not go into receivership when they cannot borrow money in the market. http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/cp/outstandings.htm
john
GE either needs to go way down and possibly fold, or fire their CEO who has taken them down the tank in the first place. Save the company or the CEO. I would think that would be obvious to the Board.
Marty Ueland
I have admired Warren Buffet for all of these years as the wise guy, but now I am 65 years old, and find he is not. Buying into such a one sided liberal group of people takes all of the respect away.
T. M. Hardy
What the author of the attached article did not mention is that even the company's industrial businesses are in jeopardy of a drastic, and perhaps dramatic, slow down because of the ever slowing global economic slowdown caused by the present crisis and other macroeconomic factors. The financial services companies that Wall Street, and many other financial pundits, had long espoused GE spin off are threatening the tenability of the company's coveted triple A rating. The company's recent preferred stock investment by Mr. Buffett was an attempt to shore up the company's balance sheet for the preservation of its AAA rating, and not the advertised reasons it told the market. Additionally, any new "opportunities" that the company would take advantage of would certainly be industrial in nature and not financial services oriented, as this would exacerbate the company's already troubling structure. It is very foreseeable that a new CEO of the company will be chosen in the near future and that many of these financial services businesses will be sold off at the first discernible signs of a true recovery in the financial markets, especially by a new CEO. Conversely, the company might be forced to enter the commercial banking business to support its lending activities and better match its funding/ lending maturities, this would inevitably remove the company from the status of triple A and to more likely double A to match peers or comparable size and given its off balance sheet debt. Toia
Chet F
Congress is just like my kids were when they were young, What part of no don't they understand? Each time they do something it just makes things worse!!! The sun will certainly rise tommorrow. Unless congress gets involved.
T. M. Hardy
What the author of the attached article did not mention is that even the company’s industrial businesses are in jeopardy of a drastic, and perhaps dramatic, slow down because of the ever slowing global economic slowdown caused by the present crisis and other macroeconomic factors. The financial services companies the Wall Street, and many other financial pundits, had long espoused GE spin off are threatening the tenability of the company’s coveted triple A rating. It is very foreseeable that a new CEO of the company will be chosen in the near future and that many of these financial services businesses will be sold off at the first discernible signs of a true recovery in the financial markets, especially by a new CEO. Conversely, the company might be forced to enter the commercial banking business to support its lending activities and better match its funding/ lending maturities, this would inevitably remove the company from the status of triple A and to more likely double A to match peers or comparable size and given its off balance sheet debt.
A.A.
Warren Buffett gave an interview on Charlie Rose to promote his GE purchase. Warren is everybody's "favorite grandfather who is a billionaire but who wont' give his grandkids a nickel". Buffett didn't give American investors a nickel last night during his Charlie Rose interview either. All he did was promote the "sweet deal" that GE gave him in preferred stock which has led to this serious fall and dilution of GE common stock.
Dave
Sounds like a "bad management burrito". Run.
GKA
Complete misunderstanding of why Buffet is the richest man in the world. Be zen; take a deep-breath and repeat this mantra: short-term pain, long-term gain, short-term pain, long-term gain...
Greg
It is not what Mr. Buffet says that matters...it is what he does. Mr. Buffet has seen the toxic waste and tried to buy some of it at his valuation and he has no takers so he is going to the other side of the trade...buy best of breed companies that own the toxic waste and have thier backs against a wall because the government is going to put a higher valuation on the assets than he would...he gets his valuation and taxpayers get taken to the cleaners by him. Of course Mr. Buffet wants the bailout to pass...he has a huge bet on and wants the government (taxpayers) to cover it. Mr. Buffet's assertion that he would take 1% of the take for the government is like a Casino taking 1% of a sports bet...either way you win. He IS NOT asserting that he would buy the assets because he has looked at them and is unwilling to pay the sellers price...but the US Government has to pay the price...In the end taxpayers lose and Mr. Buffet wins...of course, the government could just buy $700 billion of Berkshire Hathaway stock....Don't listen to Mr. Buffet's words...watch what he does.
Rob
I read a bit of news about GE. Funny how the most negative often seems to be from FOX. Not that GE Capital isn't affected by the credit situation (although in a far different way than financials like BAC). Just that, even in the tone of the article, hard not to think as much about FOX's credibility as it is about what the article reports.
Alberto
Be Carefull with GE it owns a network CNBC that states everyday that GE if fine. They hammer other companies on rumors and factless news on the airwaves to cause panic. Just the other day they had the president of GE that they were well capitalized with plenty of monies in reserve. Why do they need to raise capital?
SR
Don, Buffett doesn't care about GE's stock price going to a new high becuase he is invested in non-convertible preferred shares which yield 10%. As long as GE doesn't go bankrupt, he should be good. Its so nice that you won't consider such investments because there is no way GE is going to issue the same deal to you. (or may be they will consider since you sound way smarter than Buffett..lol)
Timw
Nothing new here in Buffett's model.
Don
Buffett is getting very sloppy with his purchases. I've seen him buy things I would not even consider. He thinks his past returns and endorsement will take the stock price to new highs (he only shows up after he makes huge investments). Why doesn't the FBI investigate Moody's and S&P? They deserve blame for our problems because their ratings are not worth the paper they are written on. How many times have they downgraded a stock or investments AFTER official announcements of how BAD the company was? Yet, they continue to get a free pass from the media and the government.