<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All Eyes On Goldman Sachs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/09/16/all-eyes-on-goldman-sachs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/09/16/all-eyes-on-goldman-sachs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:57:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: geopol</title>
		<link>http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/09/16/all-eyes-on-goldman-sachs/comment-page-1/#comment-3232</link>
		<dc:creator>geopol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=172#comment-3232</guid>
		<description>This whole system is one creeping coup, an insurrection against constitution and law from beginning to end..

If a company is to big to fail then it&#039;s to big to begin with.. Think about it.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole system is one creeping coup, an insurrection against constitution and law from beginning to end..</p>
<p>If a company is to big to fail then it&#8217;s to big to begin with.. Think about it&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Baird</title>
		<link>http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/09/16/all-eyes-on-goldman-sachs/comment-page-1/#comment-3213</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron Baird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=172#comment-3213</guid>
		<description>As an investor...... I have been on the receiving end of Goldman Sachs analysts on three occasions.  Each time, the calls were suspicious indeed.  This company reeks of illegality and they will stop at nothing to feather their own bed, intentionally break any company and ruin the lives of millions of small investors with a simple analysts rating.  They have been the gold standard for years.  If they are so good, why have they rated all these thieves so highly for so many years.  Did goldman Sachs ever sound the alarm?  

If their is a God........... Goldman Sachs falls into bankruptcy and all of the books are open to the public in court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an investor&#8230;&#8230; I have been on the receiving end of Goldman Sachs analysts on three occasions.  Each time, the calls were suspicious indeed.  This company reeks of illegality and they will stop at nothing to feather their own bed, intentionally break any company and ruin the lives of millions of small investors with a simple analysts rating.  They have been the gold standard for years.  If they are so good, why have they rated all these thieves so highly for so many years.  Did goldman Sachs ever sound the alarm?  </p>
<p>If their is a God&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.. Goldman Sachs falls into bankruptcy and all of the books are open to the public in court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Wilkinson</title>
		<link>http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/09/16/all-eyes-on-goldman-sachs/comment-page-1/#comment-3210</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wilkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=172#comment-3210</guid>
		<description>Under &quot;Kryptonite&quot;:  &quot;These assets amounted to $68 bn, or 6% of its total assets, in the third quarter, down from $68 bn in the second quarter. That $68 bn is still up from $69.2 bn as of November 2007, as the decade of excess is still being unwound.&quot;  COMMENT - How is &quot;$68B&quot; in the third quarter &quot;down&quot; from &quot;$68B&quot; in the second quarter?  Also, how is &quot;$68B&quot; in the third quarter &quot;up from $69.2 bn as of November 2007&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under &#8220;Kryptonite&#8221;:  &#8220;These assets amounted to $68 bn, or 6% of its total assets, in the third quarter, down from $68 bn in the second quarter. That $68 bn is still up from $69.2 bn as of November 2007, as the decade of excess is still being unwound.&#8221;  COMMENT &#8211; How is &#8220;$68B&#8221; in the third quarter &#8220;down&#8221; from &#8220;$68B&#8221; in the second quarter?  Also, how is &#8220;$68B&#8221; in the third quarter &#8220;up from $69.2 bn as of November 2007&#8243;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schneids</title>
		<link>http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/09/16/all-eyes-on-goldman-sachs/comment-page-1/#comment-3208</link>
		<dc:creator>Schneids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=172#comment-3208</guid>
		<description>first</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>first</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>