The world's biggest bankruptcy, Lehman Brothers (LEH), American International Group (AIG) asking the Federal Reserve for help, Bank of America (BAC) buying Merrill Lynch (MER), and the world markets selling off, with the US stock market desperately fighting to hold fast.
It seems like the crisis gripping Wall Street should be a kitchen-sink event, one that has led to the most dramatic reshaping of the financial sector ever.
But is the worst really done, or will there be more heartache for investors in the coming months?
Answer: It's not over yet.
A group of global banks and securities firms announced a $70 bn loan program that financial companies can tap to help ease a credit shortage that threatens global financial markets.
Also, the Federal Reserve, in an extraordinary move, has dramatically widened its lending facilities, allowing banks to post equity as collateral, and suspended rules stopping banks from using ordinary deposits to back their investment banking units.
But the Lehman Chapter 11 bankruptcy will ignite a wave of massive writedowns as it sets a new mark-to-market pricetag for troubled assets held by publicly traded commercial and investment banks around the country, depending on the assets' exposures.
American International Group, the world's biggest insurer, a company with a $1 tn balance sheet, is in serious danger. Not out of the woods either is Citigroup (C).
And investors in Bank of America will experience acid reflux for quarters to come as the bank digests both Merrill Lynch and Countrywide Financial.
The dramatic events come on the heels of the U.S. government's seizure and backing of mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE), a move that added $1.6 tn of their operating debt to the government's budget.
The hope is that the U.S. government will reduce the two giants' $3.7 tn in mortgage guarantees and financings (a total $5.3 tn book of business when you add in the two companies' borrowings). The two mortgage giants also have $3.3 tn in off-balance sheet hedges.
However, when you read through the details of the new rescue plan, it gives these two behemoths anywhere from five to 10 years to pare back their book of business--think a Congress of the future has the intestinal fortitude to pare them back?
And now, the government may need to bail out Washington Mutual (WM), which could potentially cost taxpayers $24 bn in mortgage guarantees from the government to get a takeover done, according to Richard Bove, an analyst at Ladenburg Thalmann & Co.
Meanwhile, Morgan Stanley (MS) and Goldman Sachs (GS) are set to report what are expected to be weak third-quarter results--Goldman tomorrow and Morgan Stanley on Wednesday--as the third quarter is historically tough on the financials.
The Subprime Crisis Gone Viral
Since the subprime crisis went viral in August 2007, financial companies around the globe have taken more than $510 bn of writedowns and have raised $354 bn. That compares to the $600 bn inflation-adjusted cost of the S&L crises of the late ‘80s early ‘90s.
The writedowns arose from a drunken daisy chain of paper kryptonite in the form of bad credit derivatives that have vaporized profits earned during the housing bubble and now sit as landfill in investment portfolios around the globe.
Wall Street thought it had outfoxed shockingly lax mortgage-lending standards, because it wrongfully believed the risk from its securitization machine would ultimately would be passed along, sold on to a third party via their paper.
Investment banks also went so far as to set up off-balance-sheet accounting--through structured investment vehicles--in order to take on more risk and boost profits. Ironically, the derivatives were meant to offload risk and disperse it throughout the system, but those derivatives are now blowing up in their faces.
Nearly a dozen chief executives of financial companies have either been forced out or left their jobs. Some 100,000 workers in the sector have been laid off, with more to come.
The markets have rarely seen a crisis like this one, a seven on the financial Richter scale that comes due to an unwinding of a decade of excess, one analyst said. And in a slap to deregulatory forces, there have been 137 financial crises around the globe of all stripes since the ‘80s--versus just nine from the ‘50s to the ‘70s, according to economists at the University of Maryland.
Amidst a firestorm of criticism, the U.S. government has stepped in to save the financial system, leading to criticism of moral hazard, whereby private profiteers increasingly raid the public purse of taxpayer money to bail themselves out.
The United States of Bailouts
The after-the-fact refereeing of a free market that has turned into a free-for-all has raised criticisms that the Treasury Dept. and the Federal Reserve look like a chaotic pell mell fire brigade hosing down crises with taxpayer money, as the Washington Post calls it, leading to accusations in this election year that the country is turning into the United States of Bailouts.
The Federal Reserve, with the blessing of the Treasury Dept., orchestrated a shotgun wedding between the nearly dead Bear Stearns and JPMorgan Chase (JPM).
The Treasury has signed off on a rescue plan amounting to at least $200 bn to save mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, leading to criticism that exotic, complex--and enriching--derivatives now have the same rights to the US Treasury as plain-vanilla Treasury bonds and notes.
Treasury's rescue of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac has come under notably withering criticism, but analysts say it was necessary. An outright bankruptcy of the two would have triggered bankruptcy clauses in derivatives contracts worldwide.
Some $200 bn and $300 bn in credit-default swaps on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac respectively are now outstanding today. Just a 5% default would have triggered $25 bn total in writedowns worldwide. Fitch Ratings estimates Fannie Mae or and Freddie Mac are referenced in about 30% of synthetic collateralized debt obligations it rates.
Also, the Federal Reserve has slashed interest rates in one of the most rapid successions in its history, and has expanded its lending facilities beyond commercial banks to Wall Street, letting investment banks now even use the asset-backed securities they mint on their own as collateral for Fed borrowings.
It's hoped that moral hazard has been reduced with the Chapter 11 bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers, as 22,500 people there will lose their jobs.
But in the process, the "Fed has debased its balance sheet," notes Bove of Ladenburg Thalmann. At one time 85% plus of its assets were backed by items such as gold holdings and Treasuries, Bove observes, but "this is now down to about 45%," he says, adding, "The Fed can still buy as many assets as it wants by printing money. This will be very inflationary but the Fed will do this anyway hoping to pull the money out of the system at some later date."
Federal Reserve and Treasury officials have been parked at Wall Street firms since March, netting information about the risk exposures on Wall Street firms and at banks from potentially toxic derivatives and credit securities.
But the problems are not over.
The markets remain in the fever grip of a vicious cycle all tied to a housing market that has yet to find the bottom. Separate from that, it is hard to call the bottom of this crisis based on past history with problem loans, since in the turndown of the early 1990s, problem loans didn't stop rising until nearly a year after the financials bottomed in November of 1991.
The Risks Remain
Derivatives--collateralized debt obligations, credit default swaps, mortgage-backed securities, and commercial real estate securities--sit at the center of the wealth destruction at Lehman, Bear Stearns, and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the rest of Wall Street.
Their notional value worldwide amounts to $62 tn. Derivatives were supposed to pass along risk throughout the system, thereby lessening the impact of bad bets, though Warren Buffett warned they were really "weapons of mass destruction" in his 2002 letter to Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) investors.
American International Group in the Bulls' Eye
AIG, the world's biggest insurer, now needs to raise $40 bn, by some estimates, to avoid a credit-rating downgrade.
It has been frantically unloading businesses and selling off assets, but now faces a severe crisis as the private equity crowd, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and TPG, has pulled out of any financing since the U.S. Treasury has balked at providing a financial backstop to any deal.
AIG asked the Federal Reserve for a $40 bn bridge loan after rejecting an offer from private equity shop J.C. Flowers that would have given the buyout firm an option to acquire the whole company, the New York Times said, citing an unidentified person. Reports indicate AIG may get access to the Fed's borrowing window in an "extreme liquidity scare."
Also, New York State governor David Paterson said at a press conference the state will let AIG use $20 bn in assets as collateral held by its units to help it stay afloat, in essence borrowing from itself.
AIG chief executive officer Robert Willumstad is under pressure to raise funds after posting losses amounting to $18.5 bn over the last three quarters from toxic derivatives.
Who Gets Hurt When A Titan Falls
Lehman Brothers, founded in 1850, has endured two World Wars, the Great Depression, and a near collapse in the ‘80s and ‘90s as well as the $4.2 bn flameout of Long-Term Capital Management in 1998.
But its role as one of the biggest underwriters of mortgage-backed securities, and its purblind unwillingness to abandon this toxic profit machine, proved to be its undoing.
Specifically, the fourth largest investment firm couldn't unload $33 bn of bad commercial real-estate assets and $13 bn in sour residential mortgages. That the "bad bank" structure talked about over the weekend would suddenly house $85 bn in bad assets, double what was previously thought, added to the deep uncertainty. Lehman also at one point had $738 bn in derivatives contracts, a notional value. Their fair market value amounted to $36.8 bn.
Now a bankruptcy liquidation could trigger massive writedowns across Wall Street, as Lehman will provide a new "mark to market" price tag for similar assets. Lehman is also deeply ensconced in the huge market for credit-default swaps, where it is a top-10 player.
With more than $610 bn in debt and $639 bn in assets, its Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing is one of the largest on record, surpassing the collapse of Drexel Burnham Lambert in 1990 and WorldCom's bankruptcy in 2002.
Lehman's shares had lost 94% of their value over the last year, and the collapse came after Barclays PLC (BCS) and Bank of America could not get the U.S. Treasury to guarantee the open ended risks on Lehman's trading desks while a deal was being consummated.
Now Lehman bondholders await to see if they can get about 60 cents on the dollar in the bankruptcy, according to CreditSights. The filing is by Lehman's holding company and does not involve any of its subsidiaries. Estimates have it that Lehman owes its 10 largest unsecured creditors more than $157 bn including debts to bondholders totaling $155 bn.
Citigroup and the Bank of New York Mellon (BK) are among trustees for bondholders, and Lehman owes the two about $155 bn. Under securities law, Lehman must separate out its securities from its cash. Its accounts are insured by the Securities Investor Protection Corp. SIPC is expected to appoint a trustee to liquidate the business and protect its customers.
Merrill Lynch Saves Itself-BofA at Risk
Bank of America (BAC) is set to become the world's biggest bank, toppling JPMorgan Chase from that post, once it completes in the first quarter of 2009 its estimated $50 bn purchase of Merrill Lynch (Bank of America is swapping its stock, so the overall value will change with the rise and fall of BofA's stock, down sharply in premarket, Fox Business news director Ray Hennessey notes).
The Merrill purchase comes less than a year after BofA chief executive Ken Lewis, frustrated by subprime trading losses, told analysts on a conference call, "I've had all the fun I can stand in investment banking'' and vowed to scale back the unit. However, Lewis does want to expand, and he could not grow the bank via acquisitions of other banks due to rules prohibiting one bank from owning 10% or more of the country's deposits.
BofA is buying Merrill at a price that is over half of what Merrill was worth a year ago.
Recently, Merrill's balance sheet topped $966 bn in assets and $931 bn in liabilities. Merrill's assets are worth more than $40 a share, says Citigroup, with the wealth management unit housing the retail brokerage unit alone worth $16 a share. Merrill's 49% stake in BlackRock (BLK), the New York-based money-management company, was worth about $23 bn recently or an estimated $22 a share.
But Merrill Lynch's stock plunged to record lows last week, to $17 a share, and absorbing Merrill comes with huge risks.
Analysts expected at least $3 bn more in losses in its upcoming quarter. Oppenheimer & Co. analyst Meredith Whitney has estimated Merrill would record a $6.87 bn loss for the third quarter. Merrill had the highest ratio of "problem assets" subject to write-downs to capital of the top three independent securities firms, says Fox-Pitt, Kelton. Analysts were already betting it would have to write down another $3 bn or more in the third quarter beyond what it had announced in July.
Since the credit crisis began in the summer of 2007, Merrill has booked more than $45 billion in write-downs, wiping out its profit earned during the housing bubble. It has laid off 4,000 workers, with more expected to come in the merger.
To shore up its bottom line, chief executive John Thain, who is being commended for treating his firm's problems with alacrity, and is expected to depart in the merger with a $9 mn payout, sold Merrill's $4.4 bn stake in Bloomberg, the financial news and data service. Merrill also raised about $12 bn in equity and capital raises, and unloaded $30 bn in toxic real estate securities for cents on the dollar.
In the deal, Bank of America gets Merrill's 17,000 brokers and becomes the country's biggest player in wealth management, adding to its position as the largest issuer of credit cards, home equity loans and auto loans. It is still digesting the $2.5 bn takeover in January of Countrywide Financial, the troubled mortgage lender that has been under firing for adding to the subprime excesses with bad loans.
On the analysts' conference call this morning, as reported by Fox Business's Ken Sweet, BofA's Lewis noted "we were in no man's land for our investment banking operations. It has been frustrating, having stops and go's. This just changes that. The fact we have the breadth of products we have now is just an incredible combination. I like it again. "
Both Lewis and Thain noted the combination would have "nominal exposure to Lehman," and that Lewis is "comfortable" with Merrill's accounting for its worst assets, specifically, the marks Merrill has made to its collateralized debt obligations, noting BofA has had similar marks.
Lewis noted that "we have clearly have had a historical knowledge of Merrill Lynch over the years. We did have an advisor... [with] extensive knowledge of the company. It's not that we don't have a significant knowledge about the asset classes that are of concern." Lewis added that he parked "45 people from our bank at Merrill over the weekend."
And when asked by a UBS analyst, "Why pay $29 a share for Merrill?" Lewis replied: "It's an obvious good question. You can think of several scenarios, the more likely that Merrill Lynch had the liquidity and capacity to see this through, more likely and not they would have seen this through and come through on the other side. But others might have had the opportunity to invest in Merrill. We could have rolled the dice and got it a lower price."
But Lewis added: "The long-term possibilities were so overwhelming we didn't want to roll the dice." He added that BofA is expectedto book $2 billion in restructuring charges, cutting its regulatory tier one capital by about a quarter of a point.
The takeover ends 94 years of independence for Merrill and gives Charlotte, N.C.-based Bank of America a sales force with 16,690 brokers who manage $1.6 tn for customers, reports indicate.
The Merrill takeover would be the largest in the financial-services industry this year, data compiled by Bloomberg show. It's the fifth-largest transaction since Bank of America bought FleetBoston Financial Corp. in 2003 for about $48 bn in 2003, reports indicate.
Bank of America has 68,000 commercial customers and millions of account holders who could benefit from Merrill's investment services, bank analyst Bove notes. "Plus, Bank of America's capital allows it to hold on to questionable Merrill assets without selling them immediately into the market," he says, adding, "If these were normal times this deal would be viewed as a huge success for both companies. This may not be the case in the next few days as the markets sort out the implication of the Lehman bankruptcy filing but longer term the deal will be recognized for the success that it is."
Citigroup on the Defense
Citigroup is moving rapidly to assure the markets that it is in strong condition, Ladenburg Thalmann's Bove says. "The company is unclear about the impact of marks on its securities holdings but has provided a raft of data to support its contention that not only is it in solid position but that it has enough excess to provide funds to the Fed's new liquidity facility," Bove says. In a research report, Bove provides a compendium of quotes from Citigroup:
"... we reduced assets by $99 bn, with approximately 2/3rds driven by a reduction of legacy assets. Consumer loans are down by almost $26 bn, corporate loans were down by $17 bn and trading account assets were down by $73 bn. To date, the pattern of reducing assets and deleveraging the balance sheet has continued through this point in the third quarter.
"...Over the past 10 months, we have raised $49.7 bn in Tier 1 eligible capital from a wide range of investor types around the world in various equity categories. ... As of the second quarter, our Tier 1 capital ratio stood at 8.7%, which is well in excess of the "well-capitalized" minimums.
"...As of the second quarter, Citigroup had a deposit base of approximately $800 bn that was diversified across products and regions with more than two-thirds of it outside the U.S. This diversification, including deep access to international deposits, provides us with an important stable and low-cost source of funding.
"..As of the second quarter, we had increased our structural liquidity of equity, long-term debt and deposits by $119 bn over a 12-month time period and we have been net sellers of significant amounts of funds into the unsecured wholesale funding markets, up to and including the end of last week.
"...To date, we have extended the maturity profile of our Citigroup Senior unsecured borrowings to a weighted average maturity of seven years. We have also reduced our commercial paper program to $31.9 bn and have extended maturity to 54 days. Our reserve of cash and highly liquid securities, which stood at $65 bn at the end of the second quarter, and is essentially the same today, is up from $24 bn at year-end 2007."
Bove expects more writedowns, but at the moment he sees no need to change his earnings estimates for Citigroup and has kept his recommendation on the stock.
We, in the third world, are surprised at the scams coming one after another from the largest financial system to boast of in the richest nation, who till recently had no compunction in telling their lesser brethren to listen to their advice in all matters. Now that is pass. It is high time the dollar is devalued by the Fed.
September 17, 2008 at 9:01 am
Leslie Wing
How much of these struggling financial institutions are owned by foreign investors? Who are they and what are their political ties? Please address this issue.
September 16, 2008 at 10:22 am
Rebecca
The one thing I don't understand in all this, is that Cavuto said only 2 to 3% of housing mortgages were in default. If only 2 to 3% were in default, how is this leading to such a meltdown in the financial world? Why isn't it solvent enough if 98% of us are not defaulting on our loans?
The only way to get us out of this mess is to do away with our current tax structure. Go to fair tax for both individuals and companies. If we were to get rid of taxes, especially for companies, all those companies that moved their resources overseas (China, India, etc.) would come back and bring along others. Why this isn't happening, heaven only knows.
September 16, 2008 at 8:50 am
Jenn in Wisc.
Liz,
Has a Dow componment ever actually failed while still on the Dow?
Also, how soon could any of the 30 components be changed? Would something be done at the end of the third quarter?
September 15, 2008 at 5:23 pm
Korb
does anyone remember the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act? 1999 Clinton. His legacy still hurting us.
September 15, 2008 at 4:25 pm
Boomer
Going way back to the begining of the subprime debacle, before there was such a thing, where did all of the available cash come from that was so readily available to be lent out to just anyone?
September 15, 2008 at 4:19 pm
Greedom
It gets better...
Call me crazy, but I wonder if there is some strange incest ceremony between citi and BAC coming.
I have never ever ever considered them compatible.
Yet ?
These days ?
I have to turn on that Bank of America light... and leave it on.
Sorry Pig Pen.
September 15, 2008 at 1:37 pm
Greedom
Citigroup is moving rapidly alright !
I bet there aren't any camels at the race tracks in Dubai sponsored by Citi anymore.
THAT should be a warning sign.
If it's not on a camel in Dubai camel races, your financial institution may very well be in trouble.
Heck - Lehman would have been better off building a LARGER indoor ski resort in Dubai -
JUST to schmooze the right investors from Abu Dhabi.
Kind of like buying the Wall Street Journal so you can slant news on investment banks until the library fine is WAY over due, and amnesty day is as far away as Hank's wallet.
September 15, 2008 at 1:35 pm
chuck
First Greedom get a hand on yourself.
Last night I watch the Fox Business special on Lehman and Ike. First Lehman. I'm wondering how many employees are going to be downsized due to this bankruptcy reorganization.
Bigger Picture: with subprime now viral and moviing in hyperspace through the financial universe I can't help wonder which bank is going to be next after Lehman Brothers. I would encourage more banks to consididate themselves to save themselves to be honest with you. I'm waiting to see how all of this shakesout.
September 15, 2008 at 12:41 pm
dennis
No more bailouts ! Let them go under - the tax payer has had enough. Glub...Glub....
September 15, 2008 at 12:38 pm
Greedom
I think I'll have to re-evaluate David Byrne's: Sax and Violins as allegory to -
oh never mind.
September 15, 2008 at 11:39 am
Greedom
I know what I like
and I like what I know
September 15, 2008 at 11:06 am
Greedom
from article:
Citigroup is moving rapidly to assure the markets that it is in strong condition
HA HA HA
right
yeah
wake me later.
September 15, 2008 at 11:04 am
Greedom
Come on MacDonald
change the photo on the blog title !
It's ok - but it doesn't put the full impression -
I'd go for a darn happy face with the facial muscles schrinching...
I have adopted this myself - listen reverently... Offer what you can - dive further into dialog - repeat !
thanks for the reminder yet one more way to explicate humanity in its best potential.
September 15, 2008 at 11:04 am
Sherry
The only thing that is going to really stimulate our economy is to get the price of fuel down. Everything is affected by the high cost of fuel. When that happens our next step is to decrease our dependence on foreign fuel and rely more on natural sources such as wind energy, solar energy and increase our use of advanced technological knowledge to reduce our use of fossil fuels such as v2g , hybrid, generative braking, flex fuels, bio fuels. How can we even get a breath of air, seems soon as we do someone shoves our head under the water again. This time it is Ike and the big oil companies. Actually it is our government who seems unable to devise a plan to free us from our dependence on foreign oil. Interesting book coming out soon called The Manhattan Project of 2009 by Jeff Wilson. We all need to educate ourselves and each other on what else is available out there and put pressure on our congress and to promote and implement every resource available to us. We also need to educate ourselves on which presidential team seems most apt to devise and implement a plan. We cannot go on much longer as a nation like this. We are crossing into some very unstable economic times.
September 15, 2008 at 10:50 am
Gary Hamby
What Elizabeth writes, as usual, is spot on!!! However, my question is, "Have We Created a New Economic Model?"
The absence of government oversight for the past 7 years plus the dangers of reckless deregulation of the financial companies struck hard at the American financial system this date, threatening it in the most grave manner since the Great Depression.
In a desperate move to stave-off international credit rating reductions the Federal Reserve initiated unparallel measures to inject massive liquidity into the markets this date. Banks will be able to turn in high risk CDS’s (Credit Default Swaps) and speculative stocks for cash. What will the Federal Reserve do what such ‘assets’? Presently, no one knows with certainty what will happen, but it is likely that the American taxpayer will be stuck with the bill.
Lehman Brothers (LEH), a one-hundred and fifty-eight year old venerable Wall Street firm has filed bankruptcy this morning. This action reflects the total absence of risk management and prudent judgment by its executives. Yet, these executives, if ousted, will receive millions in compensation due to the ‘Golden Parachutes’ common in corporate America. In essence they will have received these millions for having destroyed a long-term, reputable firm with world-wide relationships. Approximately six months ago, Lehman Brothers had discussions with multiple other financial entities and sources revealed that numerous offers were extended. However, the greed and hubris of these executives prevailed and all offers were rejected because the value was not enough for them and because they would have had to surrender executive controls. Instead, bankruptcy was forced on the firm this morning. This after a weekend filled with desperate attempts to find short-term financing and/or a government bail-out that would have allowed the company to continue its operations and be compliant with government regulations for securities firms. Sadly, it will be the millions of shareholders and the twenty-thousand plus employee who will suffer.
American International Group (AIG), the nation’s largest insurance company with a trillion dollar balance sheet, is aggressively seeking a $40 billion bridge financing loan to stave off a credit rating downgrade that would trigger the need for larger amounts of capital to keep it compliant with varied regulations. This company epitomizes the problems with our financial system, as it has declined from over $90 per share to under $8 per share in the past year. Why such precipitous decline? In its simple form it is due to the high volume of mortgage loan write-offs. However, this severe decline reflects a more systemic failure intrinsic in the American financial system, i.e. unregulated companies without government oversight will take too much risk that always catches up with them.
The failure of Lehman Brothers and what appears to be the imminent failure of American International Group come on the back of government bail-out programs for Bear Sterns, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. Merrill-Lynch, the largest retail brokerage company in America has thwarted the same fate by a Bank of American buy-out over the weekend. Analysts are perplexed why Bank of America paid such a whopping premium (they purchased at $29 per share even though Merrill-Lynch closed Friday at $17.05 per share), especially in light of the continuous decline in recent weeks; and, what many believed had yet more downside. There are also many who believe that Bank of America will rue this day when the billions of bad loans on Merrill’s balance sheet force large write-offs.
All of these failures reflect the inherent problems of allowing private companies to undertake any business activity it wishes without adequate controls in place to protect shareholders and employees. Controls that have been conspicuously absent since the Bush Administration took office in 2001. Who will ultimately bear the brunt of such greed and incompetence? Tragically, it will be the American taxpayer because this administration has engineered a new economic model - Capitalism with Socialized Risk!
September 15, 2008 at 10:34 am
Greedom
Jeez Liz
You sure got this out quick ! hats off.
September 15, 2008 at 10:20 am
aboutthis blog
Elizabeth MacDonald is the stocks editor for Fox Business Network. She is recognized as one of the top prize-winning business journalists in the country, and has received 14 awards, including the top prize in business journalism, the Gerald Loeb Award for Distinguished Business Journalism, and the Newswomen's Club of New York Front Page Award for Excellence in Investigative Journalism.
athmanathan
We, in the third world, are surprised at the scams coming one after another from the largest financial system to boast of in the richest nation, who till recently had no compunction in telling their lesser brethren to listen to their advice in all matters. Now that is pass. It is high time the dollar is devalued by the Fed.
Leslie Wing
How much of these struggling financial institutions are owned by foreign investors? Who are they and what are their political ties? Please address this issue.
Rebecca
The one thing I don't understand in all this, is that Cavuto said only 2 to 3% of housing mortgages were in default. If only 2 to 3% were in default, how is this leading to such a meltdown in the financial world? Why isn't it solvent enough if 98% of us are not defaulting on our loans? The only way to get us out of this mess is to do away with our current tax structure. Go to fair tax for both individuals and companies. If we were to get rid of taxes, especially for companies, all those companies that moved their resources overseas (China, India, etc.) would come back and bring along others. Why this isn't happening, heaven only knows.
Jenn in Wisc.
Liz, Has a Dow componment ever actually failed while still on the Dow? Also, how soon could any of the 30 components be changed? Would something be done at the end of the third quarter?
Korb
does anyone remember the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act? 1999 Clinton. His legacy still hurting us.
Boomer
Going way back to the begining of the subprime debacle, before there was such a thing, where did all of the available cash come from that was so readily available to be lent out to just anyone?
Greedom
It gets better... Call me crazy, but I wonder if there is some strange incest ceremony between citi and BAC coming. I have never ever ever considered them compatible. Yet ? These days ? I have to turn on that Bank of America light... and leave it on. Sorry Pig Pen.
Greedom
Citigroup is moving rapidly alright ! I bet there aren't any camels at the race tracks in Dubai sponsored by Citi anymore. THAT should be a warning sign. If it's not on a camel in Dubai camel races, your financial institution may very well be in trouble. Heck - Lehman would have been better off building a LARGER indoor ski resort in Dubai - JUST to schmooze the right investors from Abu Dhabi. Kind of like buying the Wall Street Journal so you can slant news on investment banks until the library fine is WAY over due, and amnesty day is as far away as Hank's wallet.
chuck
First Greedom get a hand on yourself. Last night I watch the Fox Business special on Lehman and Ike. First Lehman. I'm wondering how many employees are going to be downsized due to this bankruptcy reorganization. Bigger Picture: with subprime now viral and moviing in hyperspace through the financial universe I can't help wonder which bank is going to be next after Lehman Brothers. I would encourage more banks to consididate themselves to save themselves to be honest with you. I'm waiting to see how all of this shakesout.
dennis
No more bailouts ! Let them go under - the tax payer has had enough. Glub...Glub....
Greedom
I think I'll have to re-evaluate David Byrne's: Sax and Violins as allegory to - oh never mind.
Greedom
I know what I like and I like what I know
Greedom
from article: Citigroup is moving rapidly to assure the markets that it is in strong condition HA HA HA right yeah wake me later.
Greedom
Come on MacDonald change the photo on the blog title ! It's ok - but it doesn't put the full impression - I'd go for a darn happy face with the facial muscles schrinching... I have adopted this myself - listen reverently... Offer what you can - dive further into dialog - repeat ! thanks for the reminder yet one more way to explicate humanity in its best potential.
Sherry
The only thing that is going to really stimulate our economy is to get the price of fuel down. Everything is affected by the high cost of fuel. When that happens our next step is to decrease our dependence on foreign fuel and rely more on natural sources such as wind energy, solar energy and increase our use of advanced technological knowledge to reduce our use of fossil fuels such as v2g , hybrid, generative braking, flex fuels, bio fuels. How can we even get a breath of air, seems soon as we do someone shoves our head under the water again. This time it is Ike and the big oil companies. Actually it is our government who seems unable to devise a plan to free us from our dependence on foreign oil. Interesting book coming out soon called The Manhattan Project of 2009 by Jeff Wilson. We all need to educate ourselves and each other on what else is available out there and put pressure on our congress and to promote and implement every resource available to us. We also need to educate ourselves on which presidential team seems most apt to devise and implement a plan. We cannot go on much longer as a nation like this. We are crossing into some very unstable economic times.
Gary Hamby
What Elizabeth writes, as usual, is spot on!!! However, my question is, "Have We Created a New Economic Model?" The absence of government oversight for the past 7 years plus the dangers of reckless deregulation of the financial companies struck hard at the American financial system this date, threatening it in the most grave manner since the Great Depression. In a desperate move to stave-off international credit rating reductions the Federal Reserve initiated unparallel measures to inject massive liquidity into the markets this date. Banks will be able to turn in high risk CDS’s (Credit Default Swaps) and speculative stocks for cash. What will the Federal Reserve do what such ‘assets’? Presently, no one knows with certainty what will happen, but it is likely that the American taxpayer will be stuck with the bill. Lehman Brothers (LEH), a one-hundred and fifty-eight year old venerable Wall Street firm has filed bankruptcy this morning. This action reflects the total absence of risk management and prudent judgment by its executives. Yet, these executives, if ousted, will receive millions in compensation due to the ‘Golden Parachutes’ common in corporate America. In essence they will have received these millions for having destroyed a long-term, reputable firm with world-wide relationships. Approximately six months ago, Lehman Brothers had discussions with multiple other financial entities and sources revealed that numerous offers were extended. However, the greed and hubris of these executives prevailed and all offers were rejected because the value was not enough for them and because they would have had to surrender executive controls. Instead, bankruptcy was forced on the firm this morning. This after a weekend filled with desperate attempts to find short-term financing and/or a government bail-out that would have allowed the company to continue its operations and be compliant with government regulations for securities firms. Sadly, it will be the millions of shareholders and the twenty-thousand plus employee who will suffer. American International Group (AIG), the nation’s largest insurance company with a trillion dollar balance sheet, is aggressively seeking a $40 billion bridge financing loan to stave off a credit rating downgrade that would trigger the need for larger amounts of capital to keep it compliant with varied regulations. This company epitomizes the problems with our financial system, as it has declined from over $90 per share to under $8 per share in the past year. Why such precipitous decline? In its simple form it is due to the high volume of mortgage loan write-offs. However, this severe decline reflects a more systemic failure intrinsic in the American financial system, i.e. unregulated companies without government oversight will take too much risk that always catches up with them. The failure of Lehman Brothers and what appears to be the imminent failure of American International Group come on the back of government bail-out programs for Bear Sterns, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. Merrill-Lynch, the largest retail brokerage company in America has thwarted the same fate by a Bank of American buy-out over the weekend. Analysts are perplexed why Bank of America paid such a whopping premium (they purchased at $29 per share even though Merrill-Lynch closed Friday at $17.05 per share), especially in light of the continuous decline in recent weeks; and, what many believed had yet more downside. There are also many who believe that Bank of America will rue this day when the billions of bad loans on Merrill’s balance sheet force large write-offs. All of these failures reflect the inherent problems of allowing private companies to undertake any business activity it wishes without adequate controls in place to protect shareholders and employees. Controls that have been conspicuously absent since the Bush Administration took office in 2001. Who will ultimately bear the brunt of such greed and incompetence? Tragically, it will be the American taxpayer because this administration has engineered a new economic model - Capitalism with Socialized Risk!
Greedom
Jeez Liz You sure got this out quick ! hats off.