Emac's Stock Watch | Fox Business
  • September 12, 2008 01:32 PM EDT by Elizabeth MacDonald

    Top Housing Expert Calls Housing Bottom

    An important story got buried under the avalanche of news about the fate of Lehman Brothers (LEH) today.

    A top housing expert just called the bottom of the housing crisis. He says, get this, we are nearing the bottom now.

    I am reprinting here in its entirety a piece by one of the best business journalists in the country, Justin Lahart of The Wall Street Journal. Read on:

    Wellesley College economist Karl Case, the "Case" in the widely followed S&P/Case-Shiller index of U.S. housing prices, thinks that the housing market may be near a bottom. If he's right, financial firms may be able to breathe a sigh of relief.

    At its most recent reading for June, the Case-Shiller index was 19% below its July 2006 peak, and many observers believe the decline is far from over. The inventory of unsold homes on the market is still very high, they point out, and until that excess is absorbed it's a buyers' market. What's more, with financial firms, hobbled by mortgage debt gone bad, are trying to rebuild cash reserves, making them less willing to extend loans to would-be buyers.

    Finally the combined effects of the housing and credit crises have damaged many household's balance sheets and credit worthiness, giving them a high hurdle to buying a new home. Yale University professor Robert Shiller, the co-creator of the Case/Shiller index, is among those who think it will be some time before prices stabilize.

    But in a paper presented before the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C., Thursday, Mr. Case argues that there is cause for optimism. He notes that of the 20 metropolitan areas covered by the Case/Shiller index, nine have shown prices slightly improving in recent months. He also says that the relationship between incomes and home prices has neared a level seen at the end of past housing slumps.

    How far home prices fall matters greatly for financial institutions, Goldman Sachs economist Jan Hatzius argued in another paper presented at Brookings. If the Case/Shiller index stays at its June level, total mortgage losses will come to $473 billion, Mr. Hatzius estimates - more than the $400 billion in losses he projected in an earlier study conducted with economists David Greenlaw at Morgan Stanley, Anil Kashyap at the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business and Hyung Song Shin at Princeton University. He estimates that a further 10% decline in home prices would lead to losses of $636 billion and a 20% decline would lead to $868 billion in losses.

    Mr. Hatzius used state-level data from the Mortgage Bankers Association between from 1998 through the second quarter of this year to analyze the relationship between home price declines and foreclosures in the current environment. That means that he isn't extrapolating from earlier periods, as he did in his previous study, when lender and borrower behavior may have been different. It also allows him to account for differences in the performance of different types of mortgages.

    Under the scenario where home prices fall another 10%, leading to $636 billion in mortgage losses, Mr. Hatzius calculates that lenders will cut the credit they extend to final borrowers by nearly $2 trillion, knocking 1.8% off of gross domestic product growth. While that's sizable, a weak dollar, low overnight rates and fiscal stimulus are helping mitigate the damage Mr. Hatzius points out. The situation would be much direr if Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac cut back on the amount of mortgages they guaranteed. One virtue of the government takeover of the two mortgage giants this week is that that business doesn't look as if it will be curtailed, says Mr. Hatzius.

Greedom

On the brink of the next Bank of America acquisition... Do you think people will really want to hear anymore ? read anymore ? or ? would they settle for ALL the balance sheets from FDIC/SEC 'on the table' investigations - fully spelled out as a PDF on wikileaks ? world is changing. information - is the most valuable asset eh ? iddddn't it ? (voice of Dizzy from Bob the Builder)

September 15, 2008 at 6:26 am

Greedom

I think when Alexis Glick stated she and her husband came out of a Target with a $700 bill - and they didn't know what they bought ? This ABOUT sums up Bear Stearns, Lehman - MANY others to come - thinking - wow - what'd we buy ? Didn't we LOOK at the price tags and check the value ? Then again Alexis's gripe wasn't that they got a cart full of junk. That was never revealed, so, maybe it's closer that the Lehman's and the Bear Stearns of the world didn't even ASK - What did we just spend $700 on. Maybe I should have posted this in Alexis's blog - That alone probably pegged this not for publishing, oh well. words, they just come forward !

September 15, 2008 at 6:43 am

Greedom

Genius is simply the ability to integrate, and of course often to explicate a formal system of which to allow for common denominators to show up to act as a hub for such integration (Look to Latin for Genius - Romans used it to refer to the hub of a wheel). On that, Genius is looming on MacDonald, all this data, certain passion to touch the sun, e.g. expel truth - hopefully her wings won't melt before we get the BOOK ! So far, it's been almost one to one on evaluation in the MacDonald Blog, but I hope to see more akin to William Blakes statement "All read the bible day and night, most read black where I read white" I hope to see some of the white spaces to come. Maybe those insights are held back at risk of error, or respect - or responsibility to not spook havoc... Confidence is everything these days ! heh - I feel like that's becoming a strange archetypal fixture in my personalized model of the global economy I fit into ..... Confidence from the bottom UP on the dollar and confidence from the top down on 'gettin' that golden triple A eval, or facing panic sellof - cough - AIG anyone ?

September 15, 2008 at 6:51 am

Brainman

Greedom, get off the meth. Doing something to stop the foreclosures seems like the best solution. Why can't the banks be forced to cap their rates on first and second mortgages? If the cap was at 8% and the loans currently above that were adjusted, the boost to the economy and to consumer confidence would be undeniable. Plus the taxpayers wouldn't be footing the bill.

September 15, 2008 at 9:40 am

Greedom

Sell at @.86 typo included for 2.86 buh Bye Lehman good riddance. Yea to free markets... I'm going to go have a smoke on Milton's grave.

September 15, 2008 at 11:01 am

Angela Adams

I would like to know when the guide lines for loaning money changed and under who? I would like to see a program on the high rollers who were over these large companies that are in trouble? What is their politics? I belive these people have indangered our country as much if not more so than the the terrorist. There should be some way to make these folks pay for their failures. The people who put their money in these jokers care should have some recourse.

September 15, 2008 at 11:04 am

Vegas Mess 702

I'm in Las Vegas and I know first hand that we have another 15 - 20% to go before the bottom. I estimate that the bottom will hit in Q4 of 2009 or Q1 of 2010 after we go through another ~1 million foreclosures. People are going through some of these scenarios... 1. Folks are walking away because of the huge losses in home values, and that when they do the math, they realize that its better for them long-term to stop the bleeding now. 2. Mortgages are resetting into new terms that home owners are not able to sustain. 3. Increasing unemployment / entry level recession causes reduced spending ---> downward spiral into deeper recession, more unemployment 4. Reduced access to credit means defaults go up as people can't use revolving credit to juggle their financial problems. I'm about to file a personal chapter 7 bankruptcy for 1.2 million.... this will be the first month that I have ever been deliquent in my 12 year credit history... I have a FICO of 774 at the moment. At age 30, it's hard to swallow that I was so careless / greedy when it came to purchasing real estate. Diversification would have saved me. Luckly I'm young enough to recover from this, i'm single and no kids... small business owner. I have learned a very important financial lesson about too much of a good thing, isn't a good thing. Here are my details... 1 rental home purchased with Interest only loan for $360,000 (foreclosure sold for $199,500 next door) 1 primary home purchase with Interest only loan for $590,000 (foreclosure sold for $309,000 1 block away) Total real estate purchases = $950,000 Total real estate losses = $441,500 = 46% decrease in real estate investment I'm paying $6,200/mo in Interest only loan payments for a total of ... (-$1550/mo rental) $ 74,400 / year OR $372,000 / over the next 5 years Over the next 7 - 10 years I doubt that home values will come back to this level. At some point, the home builders who have purchased so much land will continue the track homes that they have barely started. When the market picks back up, homeowners will be competing against builder specials and upgrades so plan on keeping your home for a real long time. Carefully review your own situtation and determine what is the "best business decision" for you long term. God Bless the USA, a country that will allow me to recover from this huge mistake to start over again.

September 15, 2008 at 2:59 pm

Vegas Mess 702

correction... 54% loss of value

September 15, 2008 at 3:40 pm

TK

I watched the RE prices in CA go up up up in 2005, 2006, 07 and now flatline in 08. The whole time I rented, lived in a studio, and listened to all my friends implore me to go in halfsies with them on a Hawaii spec home, a Las Vegas condo, or a Miami CondoTel. Something told me that this was not right, so I stayed put, kept accumulating cash in measly 4% CDs, and holding tight. And took the abuse. Now I have 150,000 in cash, 780 Credit, recession proof job, and am floating around offers of 75-100K less than asking, on dream homes. Time for Vulture buying baby, I LOVE IT. Cash is king, I see the look of agony when the realtor literally BEGS me me to make an offer on her newly re-priced 5bd 1914 Tudor, and I underbid it at 100K, and they try to counter offer. This is market I've been waiting for. Remember the stories in San Fran, when 20 people would overbid for a property, and the arrogant seller would ask everyone to "write me a letter explaining why I should sell this condo to you"? God I hope that person re-levered up to an variable interest only mega loan. Woo hoo!!! (PS I am totally gloating here, chickens coming home to roost as one infamous demagogue once said)

September 15, 2008 at 7:45 pm

about this blog

  • Elizabeth MacDonald is the stocks editor for Fox Business Network. She is recognized as one of the top prize-winning business journalists in the country, and has received 14 awards, including the top prize in business journalism, the Gerald Loeb Award for Distinguished Business Journalism, and the Newswomen's Club of New York Front Page Award for Excellence in Investigative Journalism.

most popular posts