Sweetheart mortgages given by Countrywide Financial, the nation's biggest mortgage lender, to elected officials and government bureaucrats seem tailor-made for an ethics inquiry by Congress, especially as the country is seeing a rising tide of voter anger in this presidential election year due to the massive $300 bn bailout of the housing industry at taxpayers' expense.
The mortgages at issue were allegedly given to Congressional members and staffers championing this record bailout, a bailout that now surpasses the taxpayer cost of the S&L crisis in the late ‘80s and early ‘90s.
But Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) and Rep. Mark Souder (R-Ind.) say Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, is ignoring their demands for an investigation into cheap, VIP mortgages allegedly given by Countrywide Financial to House staff members and elected officials.
Countrywide allegedly gave cheap, sweetheart mortgages to Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND) and Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.), chairman of the Senate Banking committee who reportedly saved $75,000 on his inside deals from Countrywide.
At issue are Countrywide's VIP mortgages, in which borrowers received lower interest rates and point shaves on their mortgages. Countrywide's controversial VIP mortgages were given under the "Friends of Angelo" program, nicknamed after Countrywide chief executive Angelo Mozilo, a story that first broke in Portfolio Magazine.
Both Senators have denied wrongdoing and both repotedly welcome a Senate ethics inquiry (to date, no Senate ethics hearings on the matter have been announced).
The Wall Street Journal has also reported that James Johnson, a former chief executive of Fannie Mae, resigned recently as an adviser to the presidential campaign of Sen. Barack Obama after it was disclosed that Johnson received sweetheart loans from Countrywide. Johnson's lawyer has said those loans were made on normal terms. Franklin Raines, a former head of Fannie Mae, also received sweetheart Countrywide loans, the Wall Street Journal reports.
Rep. Waxman's office did not return calls for comment.
Reps. Issa and Souder wrote to Rep. Waxman that, "given the fact that Congress is actively considering bailing out Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Countrywide, and other lenders, it is essential that Congress investigate to determine the extent that public officials and staff have been compromised by improper gifts," adding, "for all the hearings your committee has held on subjects other than waste, fraud, and abuse in the Federal government, it is an appalling lapse that the Committee is not investigating this matter."
House and Senate rules bar members from knowingly receiving gifts worth $100 or more annually from companies that use registered lobbyists. Countrywide's ethics code restricts executives, employees and board directors from improperly trying to influence government employees with money, gifts, loans, rewards, favors or anything of value.
The House committee on Oversight and Government Reform has already held hearings that attempted to link the housing bubble to outsized executive pay packages given to Countrywide's chief executive Angelo Mozilo, Merrill Lynch's former chief executive E. Stanley O'Neal and Citigroup's former head, Charles O. Prince.
In their letter to Rep. Waxman, Representatives Issa and Souder demanded that Waxman use his "influence as chairman to stop any legislation bailing out mortgage lenders until all tainted individuals have recused themselves and the legislation has been examined and declared free of any undue influence."
The housing bailout bill would provide $300 bn worth of taxpayer funds to rescue borrowers who took tens of billions of dollars worth of mortgages from lenders like Countrywide, among other things. Bank of America (BAC), helped shape the legislation via two lobbying documents outlining how to construct the bailout, obtained by Fox Business, after it announced its $2.5 bn purchase of Countrywide last January (see blog "The Bank of America Housing Bailout Bill").
The housing bill would also provide rescue funding to Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE), two publicly traded companies who critics say have gunned their lobbying engines on Capitol Hill in order to lighten regulatory oversight, including any increases in their capital cushions, now at perilously low levels.
The two mortgage finance giants have a total $54 bn in net worth, upon which sits a pyramid of debt, including $1.6 tn in borrowings to run their business. Fannie and Freddie operate a $5.3 tn book of business in which it buys and guarantees mortgages, with another $3.3 tn in hedges sitting off balance sheet, according to Lehman Bros. (LEH).
The two publicly traded companies have had a history of accounting misdeeds and have reported a total of $11.1 bn in losses over the last few quarters. Freddie and Fannie combined have on their balance sheets $260 bn in subprime and Alt-A (just a notch above subprime) securitizations, backed by potentially shoddy loans.
Freddie also has disclosed it has $156.8 bn in level three assets nobody wants and for which it can't get pricetags on since the market for them is frozen; Fannie has $56.1 bn.
So far, any money given to Fannie and Freddie has not been conditioned on capping executive pay or receivership, which would include breaking up the companies and cleaning out their richly paid management and boards that concocted these two potential economic sinkholes.
A growing number of economists and analysts belive the two are insolvent, as home foreclosures rise to record levels and borrowers fall underwater on their mortgages. Senate majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is now blocking a vote on an amendment proposed by South Carolina Republican Jim DeMint to bar the two from lobbying in the future.
In their letter to Rep. Waxman, Representatives Issa and Souder refer to fresh details on Countrywide's sweetheart loan deals given to government officials via its VIP mortgage program.
Specifically, the two cite an August 2008 article in Conde Nast's Portfolio Magazine, which reports new allegations that House of Representatives staffers, a California state appeals court judge, and other current and former federal officials received special treatment in their mortgages from Countrywide due to their positions.
Portfolio has reported that former Clinton cabinet member Donna Shalala, former Bush Cabinet member Alphonso Jackson, as well as former United Nations Ambassador Richard Holbrooke also received VIP mortgages from Countrywide.
And Portfolio says that VIP Countrywide loans were given to former Countrywide director Henry Cisneros, who served as secretary of Housing and Urban Development in the Clinton administration; former White House staffer Paul Begala, now a commentator on CNN; and Postmaster General John Potter. Countrywide also offered special discounts to Congressional staffers involved in housing issues, the magazine says (http://www.portfolio.com/news-markets/national-news/portfolio/2008/07/16/Countrywide-Deals-Exposed?print=true).
The Portfolio article reported that former Countrywide Financial loan officer Robert Feinberg stated that he personally spoke with Senator Dodd and Senator Conrad about their special mortgage deals. It also noted the existence of e-mail traffic between Mr. Feinberg and former Countrywide CEO Angelo Mozilo on the subject of VIP loans and notes that Mr. Feinberg is in possession of "stacks of documents about the VIP operation."
On the subject of Countrywide's federal lobbying efforts, the Portfolio article provides quotes from retired Countrywide managing director Sidney Lenz, who oversaw government relations for the lender. Lenz reportedly says the company's lobbyists identified potential customers on Capitol Hill and in federal agencies and directed them to Countrywide's VIP program.
The company's lobbyists were "incredibly receptive" to loan requests from officials, Portfolio quotes Lenz as saying, adding, "Countrywide had an incredibly good relationship with Congress. It was not unusual for us to get a call saying, 'A bill's being introduced. It's a little technical, and there are parts we don't understand. Can you help educate us on this?'"
Similarly, Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) has also called for hearings to determine whether members received "preferential treatment" with their mortgages from Countrywide, "while millions of hardworking Americans struggle to repay their mortgage debts and cope with $4 [per] gallon gasoline and soaring foods prices," he noted in an open letter to Congressional colleagues.
I will let the letter from Representatives Issa and Souder to Rep. Waxman speak for itself:
"As members of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, we are troubled by your lack of response to our previous request and would like to know why the Committee is hiding from its duty to investigate this matter. Both documents and witnesses are clearly ready and available for an investigation and we would note that the Committee has investigated other improprieties committed by lobbyists."
The letter adds: "The Committee's failure to act when presented with rapidly growing evidence of wrongdoing makes a mockery of Speaker Pelosi's election promise to improve House Ethics."
Why in the world would anyone believe that Waxman would initiate an investigation obviously involving so many high profile Democrats. Waxman is not going to allow the onus of impropriety to be cast upon any Democratic elected official lest it deter the election of Obama even though this ridiculous bailout is going to cost the taxpayer billions.
This government, both the House and the Senate, have evolved into nothing more than a second rate Mafia. The greater difference between the Mafia and their counterparts in the House and Senate is that the Mafia had the decency to kill each other off. The House and Senate continue to kill the taxpayer year after year.
If there was ever cause for impeachment proceedings to begin it should begin with Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi. These are the two incompetents who stated two years ago, "bipartisanship" will now be reinstated to the political process because the Democrats have regained the majority.
And to think for one minute that we wish to foist this type of government on any other nation in the world is absurd.
July 25, 2008 at 9:57 am
Rob Mc - MN
Rep. Waxman would rather spend his time interviewing Roger Clemens than actually performing the duties required by his position.
July 25, 2008 at 9:54 am
Manfred
Whats new ? The good ol boys club at it again. The U.S. Senate & House need to change their names. CROOKS seams to fit a little better. Our founding fathers would be shocked on how OUR country is run now days.
July 25, 2008 at 9:49 am
Rob Mc - MN
There is no accountability for Congress. Dodd should resign in shame. He is a big part of the problem. If this were an officer of a Federal Reserve Bank...they would have been asked him to resign for such a conflict of interest. You can get fired for tanishing the image of the FRB. Can't get much higher that Dodd is in the banking system. Is there any wonder why the system is so screwed up! This is sick!
July 25, 2008 at 9:47 am
Wilfred
I am old enough to remember long periods during which Democrats controlled everything:
The Presidency, the House and the Senate. During the periods they didn't control the Presidency, they coud effectively block much of what a President proposed. These were periods marked by misfeasance, malfeasance and nonfeasance. It looks as if their "happy days are here again" and it's just getting started Folks.
July 25, 2008 at 9:42 am
jack miller
the same place as the queries into karl rove et al, joe wilson etc.
July 25, 2008 at 9:38 am
tyndal
What should we expect, the righ getting risher on the macks of the now non existant middle class.
What should be done is not a bailout but a payoff.
If the government pays 10 billion to a mortagage due to bolstering the bad loans/foreclosures, the buisiness should have to apply that as a credit to the outstanding loans that are folding.
A family who lost their jobs and are in hardship, a basic forclosed loan in process. They MUST apply the credit to the loan in effect paying off most if not all of the loan. This would reduce the liability of the lender and give the most in need a real boost.
as for taxpayers securing the speculative lenders/investors, Not good for the enron pensioneers, not good when countless lost on stocks. them's the risks.
July 25, 2008 at 9:38 am
rflyer
Yes I would like to know who is going to go to jail for all this!! All those banks and loan companies made bad/illegal loans and should have to pay for it NOT the taxpayers!! This is going to end up just like the last savings & loan bailout, we the taxpayers are going to shoulder the cost of this while the CEOs and loan officers who made all these bad loans will be sitting in the Bahamas somewhere sipping drinks and having a big time.
July 25, 2008 at 9:32 am
ROBERT DAVIS
WHY SHOULD THIS BE DIFFERENT THAN ANY OTHER OUTRIGHT THIEVERY BY THE DEMS?
WAXMAN SHOULD HAVE BEEN RETIRED LONG AGO. HE BLAMES PRES.BUSH FOR EVERYTHING.ITS ALMOST TO THE POINT THAT IF IT RAINS PRES BUSH IS RESPONSIBLE.A HURICANE IS HIS FAULT. PELOSI IS A LIAR AND A RADICAL REID SHOULD BE PUT IN AN INSTITUTION AND IN TRUTH WE SHOULD REPLACE THE ENTIRE CONGRESS AND START OVER.
July 25, 2008 at 9:11 am
Tripp
This is a joke. Does anyone really believe that the Dems really meant it when they said they wanted to end the "culture of corruption"?
They are all just power hungry, and will say whatever it takes to get them into office. Only a select few from each party really want to end things like this, but the vast majority on each side regard those few as fringe members. Sure, they might use the rhetoric, but when they get into power it's back to the status quo.
Elizabeth MacDonald is the stocks editor for Fox Business Network. She is recognized as one of the top prize-winning business journalists in the country, and has received 14 awards, including the top prize in business journalism, the Gerald Loeb Award for Distinguished Business Journalism, and the Newswomen's Club of New York Front Page Award for Excellence in Investigative Journalism.
dharper
Why in the world would anyone believe that Waxman would initiate an investigation obviously involving so many high profile Democrats. Waxman is not going to allow the onus of impropriety to be cast upon any Democratic elected official lest it deter the election of Obama even though this ridiculous bailout is going to cost the taxpayer billions. This government, both the House and the Senate, have evolved into nothing more than a second rate Mafia. The greater difference between the Mafia and their counterparts in the House and Senate is that the Mafia had the decency to kill each other off. The House and Senate continue to kill the taxpayer year after year. If there was ever cause for impeachment proceedings to begin it should begin with Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi. These are the two incompetents who stated two years ago, "bipartisanship" will now be reinstated to the political process because the Democrats have regained the majority. And to think for one minute that we wish to foist this type of government on any other nation in the world is absurd.
Rob Mc - MN
Rep. Waxman would rather spend his time interviewing Roger Clemens than actually performing the duties required by his position.
Manfred
Whats new ? The good ol boys club at it again. The U.S. Senate & House need to change their names. CROOKS seams to fit a little better. Our founding fathers would be shocked on how OUR country is run now days.
Rob Mc - MN
There is no accountability for Congress. Dodd should resign in shame. He is a big part of the problem. If this were an officer of a Federal Reserve Bank...they would have been asked him to resign for such a conflict of interest. You can get fired for tanishing the image of the FRB. Can't get much higher that Dodd is in the banking system. Is there any wonder why the system is so screwed up! This is sick!
Wilfred
I am old enough to remember long periods during which Democrats controlled everything: The Presidency, the House and the Senate. During the periods they didn't control the Presidency, they coud effectively block much of what a President proposed. These were periods marked by misfeasance, malfeasance and nonfeasance. It looks as if their "happy days are here again" and it's just getting started Folks.
jack miller
the same place as the queries into karl rove et al, joe wilson etc.
tyndal
What should we expect, the righ getting risher on the macks of the now non existant middle class. What should be done is not a bailout but a payoff. If the government pays 10 billion to a mortagage due to bolstering the bad loans/foreclosures, the buisiness should have to apply that as a credit to the outstanding loans that are folding. A family who lost their jobs and are in hardship, a basic forclosed loan in process. They MUST apply the credit to the loan in effect paying off most if not all of the loan. This would reduce the liability of the lender and give the most in need a real boost. as for taxpayers securing the speculative lenders/investors, Not good for the enron pensioneers, not good when countless lost on stocks. them's the risks.
rflyer
Yes I would like to know who is going to go to jail for all this!! All those banks and loan companies made bad/illegal loans and should have to pay for it NOT the taxpayers!! This is going to end up just like the last savings & loan bailout, we the taxpayers are going to shoulder the cost of this while the CEOs and loan officers who made all these bad loans will be sitting in the Bahamas somewhere sipping drinks and having a big time.
ROBERT DAVIS
WHY SHOULD THIS BE DIFFERENT THAN ANY OTHER OUTRIGHT THIEVERY BY THE DEMS? WAXMAN SHOULD HAVE BEEN RETIRED LONG AGO. HE BLAMES PRES.BUSH FOR EVERYTHING.ITS ALMOST TO THE POINT THAT IF IT RAINS PRES BUSH IS RESPONSIBLE.A HURICANE IS HIS FAULT. PELOSI IS A LIAR AND A RADICAL REID SHOULD BE PUT IN AN INSTITUTION AND IN TRUTH WE SHOULD REPLACE THE ENTIRE CONGRESS AND START OVER.
Tripp
This is a joke. Does anyone really believe that the Dems really meant it when they said they wanted to end the "culture of corruption"? They are all just power hungry, and will say whatever it takes to get them into office. Only a select few from each party really want to end things like this, but the vast majority on each side regard those few as fringe members. Sure, they might use the rhetoric, but when they get into power it's back to the status quo.