about this blog
- Elizabeth MacDonald is the stocks editor for Fox Business Network. She is recognized as one of the top prize-winning business journalists in the country, and has received 14 awards, including the top prize in business journalism, the Gerald Loeb Award for Distinguished Business Journalism, and the Newswomen's Club of New York Front Page Award for Excellence in Investigative Journalism.
most popular posts
-
- There are no viewed posts at this time.
Psychic Advice
Great blog, but i couldnt understand where can i subscribe to your rss feed?
Bob Meyer
Protecting Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac is almost as bad an idea as the Smoot-Hawley Tariffs were during the Great Depression. When private capital markets began to balk at continuing their investments in housing, Freddy an Fanny picked up the slack and ultimately this was the cause of the insane housing bubble. These two organizations caused the mis-investment of trillions of dollars that could have gone into factories, research or any number of better things than making housing un-affordable. Now, after this waste of an almost inconceivable amount of wealth, we are supposed to protect Freddy and Fanny so that they can continue to destroy capital through more mis-investment. How can making the bubble bigger possibly help anyone? The only way out of this mess is to let Freddy and Fanny pass into history. These are terrible institutions guided by political favor instead of the market. Far from causing a depression, the death of these wealth destroyers assure that the recession will be short-lived because the capital will be there to rebuild. If a new house costs the new owner $1500 per month instead of $2500 there is a thousand dollars per month available for new purchases and this will create new jobs in new industries. New is the key here. It is into new areas that economy has to enter if it is to survive. The old economy is dying from entrepreneurial senility of the Fanny Mae / Freddy Mac kind. A home is not an investment, it is just a place to live. It should not appreciate in value any more than cars, clothes, electronics or anything else that doesn't produce wealth. A twenty year old house should cost less today in real dollar terms than it did when it was new. If a non wealth producing commodity appreciates in value you can be sure that the government is diddling with the supply or demand somewhere. Freddy and Fanny are just the most recent examples of this.
Justin
The Fed not coming out with the truth until after the markets closed has all the makings of a conspiracy. This is nuts. I think it was an attempt to squeeze the shorts and prevent Freddie and Fannie from taking too much collateral damage in one day. This is financial armageddon. If somehow the investment banks manage to report better than expected earnings (or posting smaller losses than expected in this case) by using every accounting cheat in their arsenal, you can bet I'll be looking for a rally to short into. This is nuts, I'll say it again. The FDIC better get those printing presses ready. We've just begun to see the runs on the banks.
Earl Tomlinson
Your analysis and remedy seems reasonable. The government must prop up these financial organizations because they are critical to the mortage business. Politics aside, the US is weaker than it has been in years at least in the perception of the world. The weak dollar, transfer of wealth to the middle east, china, nigeria etc only makes it worse. We are still a can do nation but we must pull together more than we have in the past. Our cultural differences are minor compared to the train wreck of a broken economy, high interest rates and high unemployment. Let's roll up our sleeves and "git er done"!
Bob
Come on! A bailout is hardly free enterprise. If they fail, they fail--just let free enterprise happen!