Emac's Stock Watch | Fox Business
  • July 11, 2008 05:53 PM EDT by Elizabeth MacDonald

    A Rescue Plan for Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae

    The Dow industrials broke through the 11,000 level, a level investors have not seen since summer 2006, ending just a bit above that threshold.

    Tensions over the perilous health of the U.S. mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac added to a chaotic close. Despite an earlier wire report to the contrary, the Federal Reserve announced after the close that it does not plan to extend the discount lending facility to these troubled institutions.

    So what to do about these twin pillars of housing finance, so key now to Congress's housing bailout?

    Here's what you do, if needed. Give them a 10-year loan similar to the one given to JPMorgan Chase (JPM) when JP parked its ambulance in front of Bear Stearns on St. Patrick's Day, did a cat scan on Bear's assets and said wait a second, $30 bn of Bear's stuff is truly rotten, give us a 10-year Fed loan (at a cheap rate of just over 2%), backed by these assets, or no deal.

    You sell a Fannie-Freddie loan to the taxpayer and the stock market by saying, the US government will make money on this loan, we'll get that money back and then some by charging an interest rate, pegged, say, two percentage points above the 10-year treasury, and then we get to sell some assets off too. Make the taxpayer and the market believe the government will profit off any rescue. That's the key.

    Just like Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke did in explaining away in testimony before Congress its orchestrated, shotgun marriage between JPMorgan and Bear, where he reiterated that the Fed will make money on its loan to JPMorgan and the collateral sale too (now overseen by Black Rock). The size of the loan is another matter-some say $50 bn, others say $100 bn.

    The taxpayer and the markets must be reassured that the government simply doesn't let things fall to pieces, that the government will profit from any rescue.

    These two simply cannot go under, nor can the US take them on its balance sheets. Fannie and Freddie buy mortgages from banks so banks can then turn around and have more money to make loans to borrowers. They also sell mortgages to investors as securities, and they get paid a fee to guarantee these securities if they go bad.

    Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, own or guarantee about half of the $12 trillion of US mortgages. They provide funding for nearly three-quarters of new US mortgages.

    And together they now oversee 83% of mortgage backed securities, up from 33% just a couple of years back.

    Together they have $81 bn in core capital and $54 bn in shareholder equity supporting that $5.3 tn, which equates to the entire US public debt held in private hands (not including the off balance sheet items).

    Get this, another $3.3 tn worth of their debt and assets sits in off balance sheet vehicles. The hot zone in their books are the $260bn in sub prime and what are called Alt-A loans, which sit between the rotten subprime stuff and the prime loans. 

    Neither of these mortgage giants is backed by the government, however. They each have a $2.25 bn pipeline into the Treasury in the form of a credit line.

    I don't think we are headed for a calamitous nationalization of these two giants. The credit rating for the entire country would drop to junk status, the dollar would fly off a cliff, and oil would go higher than $200, as oil is priced in dollars.

    The government will not allow this national nervous breakdown.

    Besides the idea I gave at the top, there is a way to avoid a financial nuclear winter in the midst of this heated market and a hot summer.

    And sit tight, too, as the financials, whose rotten profit results have been stinking up place, will see Merrill Lynch (MER) and Citigroup (C), already struggling with bombed out share prices, out with their latest quarterly earnings next week.

    A rights offering to Fannie and Freddie shareholders has been discussed, where stock is sold at a discount to investors, with any leftover rights not exercised bought by US government. That's a good idea. Other ideas involve the Treasury buying stock in the companies, or a purchase by the Fed of some of their debt or mortgage-backed securities. Stay tuned.

Psychic Advice

Great blog, but i couldnt understand where can i subscribe to your rss feed?

July 12, 2008 at 7:29 am

Bob Meyer

Protecting Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac is almost as bad an idea as the Smoot-Hawley Tariffs were during the Great Depression. When private capital markets began to balk at continuing their investments in housing, Freddy an Fanny picked up the slack and ultimately this was the cause of the insane housing bubble. These two organizations caused the mis-investment of trillions of dollars that could have gone into factories, research or any number of better things than making housing un-affordable. Now, after this waste of an almost inconceivable amount of wealth, we are supposed to protect Freddy and Fanny so that they can continue to destroy capital through more mis-investment. How can making the bubble bigger possibly help anyone? The only way out of this mess is to let Freddy and Fanny pass into history. These are terrible institutions guided by political favor instead of the market. Far from causing a depression, the death of these wealth destroyers assure that the recession will be short-lived because the capital will be there to rebuild. If a new house costs the new owner $1500 per month instead of $2500 there is a thousand dollars per month available for new purchases and this will create new jobs in new industries. New is the key here. It is into new areas that economy has to enter if it is to survive. The old economy is dying from entrepreneurial senility of the Fanny Mae / Freddy Mac kind. A home is not an investment, it is just a place to live. It should not appreciate in value any more than cars, clothes, electronics or anything else that doesn't produce wealth. A twenty year old house should cost less today in real dollar terms than it did when it was new. If a non wealth producing commodity appreciates in value you can be sure that the government is diddling with the supply or demand somewhere. Freddy and Fanny are just the most recent examples of this.

July 12, 2008 at 3:25 am

Justin

The Fed not coming out with the truth until after the markets closed has all the makings of a conspiracy. This is nuts. I think it was an attempt to squeeze the shorts and prevent Freddie and Fannie from taking too much collateral damage in one day. This is financial armageddon. If somehow the investment banks manage to report better than expected earnings (or posting smaller losses than expected in this case) by using every accounting cheat in their arsenal, you can bet I'll be looking for a rally to short into. This is nuts, I'll say it again. The FDIC better get those printing presses ready. We've just begun to see the runs on the banks.

July 11, 2008 at 9:58 pm

Earl Tomlinson

Your analysis and remedy seems reasonable. The government must prop up these financial organizations because they are critical to the mortage business. Politics aside, the US is weaker than it has been in years at least in the perception of the world. The weak dollar, transfer of wealth to the middle east, china, nigeria etc only makes it worse. We are still a can do nation but we must pull together more than we have in the past. Our cultural differences are minor compared to the train wreck of a broken economy, high interest rates and high unemployment. Let's roll up our sleeves and "git er done"!

July 11, 2008 at 8:38 pm

Bob

Come on! A bailout is hardly free enterprise. If they fail, they fail--just let free enterprise happen!

July 11, 2008 at 6:32 pm

about this blog

  • Elizabeth MacDonald is the stocks editor for Fox Business Network. She is recognized as one of the top prize-winning business journalists in the country, and has received 14 awards, including the top prize in business journalism, the Gerald Loeb Award for Distinguished Business Journalism, and the Newswomen's Club of New York Front Page Award for Excellence in Investigative Journalism.