<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Merrill Lynch May Cut into Its Muscle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/07/07/why-merrill-lynch-may-cut-into-its-muscle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/07/07/why-merrill-lynch-may-cut-into-its-muscle/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:57:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bank-Implode! &#187; Merrill Lynch - $37.5B/*/$34.4B</title>
		<link>http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/07/07/why-merrill-lynch-may-cut-into-its-muscle/comment-page-1/#comment-2273</link>
		<dc:creator>Bank-Implode! &#187; Merrill Lynch - $37.5B/*/$34.4B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 01:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=112#comment-2273</guid>
		<description>[...] Merrill Lynch has almost no shareholder equity. The company&#8217;s shareholder equity has been almost entirely contaminated by Level 3 toxic trash. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Merrill Lynch has almost no shareholder equity. The company&#8217;s shareholder equity has been almost entirely contaminated by Level 3 toxic trash. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greedom</title>
		<link>http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/07/07/why-merrill-lynch-may-cut-into-its-muscle/comment-page-1/#comment-2232</link>
		<dc:creator>Greedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=112#comment-2232</guid>
		<description>I guess I&#039;m saying, don&#039;t forget to build 33% out of, or into - depending on how you look at it - your evaluation of ML.  Too many L&#039;s anyway.

R&#039;s and L&#039;s are extremely costly phonetically. 

And Merrill Lynch has em.

Well, while THAT might be absurd - I see in ink - 
the 9 billion in toxic subprime CDO&#039;s.
take the 36.5 billion and keep in mind the impact of the 9 it will have on revaluing or reevaluating that 36.5 current stock pricing.   I say - why not expect at least approx 33% down on the stock ? 

so, another 12 billion loss OR what - stock at 24 billion - on a not so dry wafer called the dollar - and what restaurant serves soggy wafers eh ? (voice of Ukrainian farm woman age in her 90&#039;s poking a stick as she yells it at you).

the loss just piles up

so, hmm- 30 billion pounds in Sterling ? Why, that&#039;s probably nothing compared to what&#039;s pushed out of London a day eh ?

ML could probably live and die on an over leveraged reach out of its boat on this stormy sea - tipping itself.

compared to what again - goes out of London probably for or through ML.

Sheesh, there&#039;s an analogy here to one way a corporation can get consumed and deconstructed or just vaporized like Bear Stearns in a 48 hour window, or did BS really fall between Palm Springs CEO Schwartz saying &quot;Ya know, I&#039;ll tell ya, it&#039;s ALL speculators involved here&quot; and when it fell ? 

something along those lines - but was it really that Friday eve when he said that to what ? Saturday ? MORNING ? EVENING ? I do wonder.  Certainly by Sunday - Bernanke was off to sort out this 30 billion deal - regardless... I wonder was it Saturday technically- or better- what if it was Friday evening LATER - before midnight !

Then you&#039;d have the CEO saying that on the same day -would be priceless.

oh well - I a new temp agency to offer short term insurance !

the new not so bad federalized American Expresses to any investment firm in trouble - 

someone should just port out Bank in a Box and sell it to all investment banks - so they can claim they have one formal teller service -  online only !  heh - and are qualified. - oh wait - SILLY ME - you don&#039;t HAVE to be a consumer/commercial bank anymore - you can be a Bear Stearns and get that window served breakfast with a tab you can pay off later.

I still say oil is downstream from dollar - more importantly - I hear someone has taken the time to embed the solar I wanted - and now ? it&#039;s a matter of a flat out $ investment - before I can finally benefit in charging my car while I roam a supermarket  examining every product for 3 hours !

Don&#039;t forget to look at the sub-pristine banks that came out golden in all of this subprime mess- Who knows, long term ? I bet Berkshire Hathaway swoops down and becomes a respectable insurance broker at the same time - as I once saw someone put it &#039;minting&#039; it&#039;s own money. heh   Gee, that was 2 years ago, I can&#039;t imagine the bargains out there for those with deep enough pockets to really restructure during all of this - picking up excellent buys.

Clarity in understanding what more primal causal factors drive the dollar for example has an excellent return rate !  no money down !

Oh well- would be a LOT of fun to see some of the top craziest loans offered from 2003 to the present.

In a way - call it celebrating their 5th birthday - where payments actually start showing up- 

OR 

do they ? ouch !

and I think that&#039;s a serious question on the do they part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I&#8217;m saying, don&#8217;t forget to build 33% out of, or into &#8211; depending on how you look at it &#8211; your evaluation of ML.  Too many L&#8217;s anyway.</p>
<p>R&#8217;s and L&#8217;s are extremely costly phonetically. </p>
<p>And Merrill Lynch has em.</p>
<p>Well, while THAT might be absurd &#8211; I see in ink &#8211;<br />
the 9 billion in toxic subprime CDO&#8217;s.<br />
take the 36.5 billion and keep in mind the impact of the 9 it will have on revaluing or reevaluating that 36.5 current stock pricing.   I say &#8211; why not expect at least approx 33% down on the stock ? </p>
<p>so, another 12 billion loss OR what &#8211; stock at 24 billion &#8211; on a not so dry wafer called the dollar &#8211; and what restaurant serves soggy wafers eh ? (voice of Ukrainian farm woman age in her 90&#8217;s poking a stick as she yells it at you).</p>
<p>the loss just piles up</p>
<p>so, hmm- 30 billion pounds in Sterling ? Why, that&#8217;s probably nothing compared to what&#8217;s pushed out of London a day eh ?</p>
<p>ML could probably live and die on an over leveraged reach out of its boat on this stormy sea &#8211; tipping itself.</p>
<p>compared to what again &#8211; goes out of London probably for or through ML.</p>
<p>Sheesh, there&#8217;s an analogy here to one way a corporation can get consumed and deconstructed or just vaporized like Bear Stearns in a 48 hour window, or did BS really fall between Palm Springs CEO Schwartz saying &#8220;Ya know, I&#8217;ll tell ya, it&#8217;s ALL speculators involved here&#8221; and when it fell ? </p>
<p>something along those lines &#8211; but was it really that Friday eve when he said that to what ? Saturday ? MORNING ? EVENING ? I do wonder.  Certainly by Sunday &#8211; Bernanke was off to sort out this 30 billion deal &#8211; regardless&#8230; I wonder was it Saturday technically- or better- what if it was Friday evening LATER &#8211; before midnight !</p>
<p>Then you&#8217;d have the CEO saying that on the same day -would be priceless.</p>
<p>oh well &#8211; I a new temp agency to offer short term insurance !</p>
<p>the new not so bad federalized American Expresses to any investment firm in trouble &#8211; </p>
<p>someone should just port out Bank in a Box and sell it to all investment banks &#8211; so they can claim they have one formal teller service &#8211;  online only !  heh &#8211; and are qualified. &#8211; oh wait &#8211; SILLY ME &#8211; you don&#8217;t HAVE to be a consumer/commercial bank anymore &#8211; you can be a Bear Stearns and get that window served breakfast with a tab you can pay off later.</p>
<p>I still say oil is downstream from dollar &#8211; more importantly &#8211; I hear someone has taken the time to embed the solar I wanted &#8211; and now ? it&#8217;s a matter of a flat out $ investment &#8211; before I can finally benefit in charging my car while I roam a supermarket  examining every product for 3 hours !</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget to look at the sub-pristine banks that came out golden in all of this subprime mess- Who knows, long term ? I bet Berkshire Hathaway swoops down and becomes a respectable insurance broker at the same time &#8211; as I once saw someone put it &#8216;minting&#8217; it&#8217;s own money. heh   Gee, that was 2 years ago, I can&#8217;t imagine the bargains out there for those with deep enough pockets to really restructure during all of this &#8211; picking up excellent buys.</p>
<p>Clarity in understanding what more primal causal factors drive the dollar for example has an excellent return rate !  no money down !</p>
<p>Oh well- would be a LOT of fun to see some of the top craziest loans offered from 2003 to the present.</p>
<p>In a way &#8211; call it celebrating their 5th birthday &#8211; where payments actually start showing up- </p>
<p>OR </p>
<p>do they ? ouch !</p>
<p>and I think that&#8217;s a serious question on the do they part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greedom</title>
		<link>http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/07/07/why-merrill-lynch-may-cut-into-its-muscle/comment-page-1/#comment-2226</link>
		<dc:creator>Greedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=112#comment-2226</guid>
		<description>(might be report, browser never valided this was sent)
Ok Ok, 

I&#039;ll drop the Franks Di Rita war profiteering theory.

But from ML news above - 40+ billion in residential mortgage ? 

from article:
$61.7 bn cash and equivalents on its balance sheet, 
$36.5 bn in shareholder equity, but it has $34.4 bn in illiquid level 3 trades, both assets and liabilities that it can’t get a pricetag on because no one wants these items. 
$9 bn in toxic subprime collateralized debt obligations, those cut and paste jobs few can make any sense of, with another 
$4.6 bn in asset-backed securities propped up by corporate bonds and loans. 
$44 bn in exposures to residential mortgages as well.

gee, 9 + 4.6 +  a mystery bag of 44.

13.6 guaranteed problematic
call it 5 on residential to lowball it.

that&#039;s 18.6 -  NEARLY 1/3 total value of TOXIC WASTE !

Now,  let&#039;s presume stock holders figure that out - let&#039;s call the 25 billion approx. in shareholders ? and devalue THAAAAAYAT 33% -  at the least.

I&#039;d say Merril Lynch isn&#039;t cutting into its muscle.

I&#039;d say Merrill Lynch will be lucky to not have to cut off a limb here.


Thanks for another article - you clearly have a strong grasp on the sector- I very much enjoy when people have forest from the trees insights or in your case, they read like detective stories at times, as the thesis reveals itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(might be report, browser never valided this was sent)<br />
Ok Ok, </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll drop the Franks Di Rita war profiteering theory.</p>
<p>But from ML news above &#8211; 40+ billion in residential mortgage ? </p>
<p>from article:<br />
$61.7 bn cash and equivalents on its balance sheet,<br />
$36.5 bn in shareholder equity, but it has $34.4 bn in illiquid level 3 trades, both assets and liabilities that it can’t get a pricetag on because no one wants these items.<br />
$9 bn in toxic subprime collateralized debt obligations, those cut and paste jobs few can make any sense of, with another<br />
$4.6 bn in asset-backed securities propped up by corporate bonds and loans.<br />
$44 bn in exposures to residential mortgages as well.</p>
<p>gee, 9 + 4.6 +  a mystery bag of 44.</p>
<p>13.6 guaranteed problematic<br />
call it 5 on residential to lowball it.</p>
<p>that&#8217;s 18.6 &#8211;  NEARLY 1/3 total value of TOXIC WASTE !</p>
<p>Now,  let&#8217;s presume stock holders figure that out &#8211; let&#8217;s call the 25 billion approx. in shareholders ? and devalue THAAAAAYAT 33% &#8211;  at the least.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say Merril Lynch isn&#8217;t cutting into its muscle.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say Merrill Lynch will be lucky to not have to cut off a limb here.</p>
<p>Thanks for another article &#8211; you clearly have a strong grasp on the sector- I very much enjoy when people have forest from the trees insights or in your case, they read like detective stories at times, as the thesis reveals itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greedom</title>
		<link>http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/07/07/why-merrill-lynch-may-cut-into-its-muscle/comment-page-1/#comment-2221</link>
		<dc:creator>Greedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=112#comment-2221</guid>
		<description>I still say

how is it the TWO top architects for the War on Terror, Media wise - Larry Di Rita - once under Rumsfeld to manage media on war on terror - now sr. spokesperson Bank of America

and General Tommy Franks - once - as Rush Limbaugh quotes it &quot;He RAN the campaign on terror in Afghanistan AND in Iraq&quot;

etc.


Gee - he&#039;s now retired and on the Board of Directors for Bank of America

THE company that stands to win - potentially 1/3 a TRILLION USD bonus award - 

for all those people that - I argue- 
and conspiracy theorists take this as humor

one would HAVE to believe the world was ending to take on a mortgage like this

AND ? 

to offer it ? 

who in their right mind could offer this / 

and pass on this toxic waste ?

&quot;Oh, what&#039;s that Frank and Linda ? you&#039;re BOTH unemployed, well well - no problem !&quot;

CW officer says

Ugh!

I say force loan originator to obligation, where top node fails, pass the responsibility to the next carrier of this diseased product - starting to reveal itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still say</p>
<p>how is it the TWO top architects for the War on Terror, Media wise &#8211; Larry Di Rita &#8211; once under Rumsfeld to manage media on war on terror &#8211; now sr. spokesperson Bank of America</p>
<p>and General Tommy Franks &#8211; once &#8211; as Rush Limbaugh quotes it &#8220;He RAN the campaign on terror in Afghanistan AND in Iraq&#8221;</p>
<p>etc.</p>
<p>Gee &#8211; he&#8217;s now retired and on the Board of Directors for Bank of America</p>
<p>THE company that stands to win &#8211; potentially 1/3 a TRILLION USD bonus award &#8211; </p>
<p>for all those people that &#8211; I argue-<br />
and conspiracy theorists take this as humor</p>
<p>one would HAVE to believe the world was ending to take on a mortgage like this</p>
<p>AND ? </p>
<p>to offer it ? </p>
<p>who in their right mind could offer this / </p>
<p>and pass on this toxic waste ?</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh, what&#8217;s that Frank and Linda ? you&#8217;re BOTH unemployed, well well &#8211; no problem !&#8221;</p>
<p>CW officer says</p>
<p>Ugh!</p>
<p>I say force loan originator to obligation, where top node fails, pass the responsibility to the next carrier of this diseased product &#8211; starting to reveal itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greedom</title>
		<link>http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/07/07/why-merrill-lynch-may-cut-into-its-muscle/comment-page-1/#comment-2220</link>
		<dc:creator>Greedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/?p=112#comment-2220</guid>
		<description>Frank and Jill to their neighbors

Frank and Jill were avid viewers of Fox News during the pilot run of the series Shock and Awe - in turn - bought into a 485k mortgage they never thought anyone would live through.

Today ?

Frank and Jill - having paid no money yet - no interest, Frank and Jill BOTH being unemployed- Frank daytrading on the extensions on home equity in the home - buying stock in the company that he &#039;thinks&#039; has his deadbeat mortgage, which isn&#039;t the right company.

yet ? 

Soon - Frank and Jill KEEP their 1/2 Million dollar home - 

pay only $600 - $700 a month
on an extended 50 year mortgage plan ? 

ALL the debt for the black SUV Escalade to intimidate the neighbors ?

paid in full

and more

and it gets better !

They&#039;ve lived 5 years - cost free !

utilities + school tax


Where was I on gravy train day at CountryWide

I should have taken out a mortgage I&#039;d HAVE to believe the world was ending to do so !

in 2003</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank and Jill to their neighbors</p>
<p>Frank and Jill were avid viewers of Fox News during the pilot run of the series Shock and Awe &#8211; in turn &#8211; bought into a 485k mortgage they never thought anyone would live through.</p>
<p>Today ?</p>
<p>Frank and Jill &#8211; having paid no money yet &#8211; no interest, Frank and Jill BOTH being unemployed- Frank daytrading on the extensions on home equity in the home &#8211; buying stock in the company that he &#8216;thinks&#8217; has his deadbeat mortgage, which isn&#8217;t the right company.</p>
<p>yet ? </p>
<p>Soon &#8211; Frank and Jill KEEP their 1/2 Million dollar home &#8211; </p>
<p>pay only $600 &#8211; $700 a month<br />
on an extended 50 year mortgage plan ? </p>
<p>ALL the debt for the black SUV Escalade to intimidate the neighbors ?</p>
<p>paid in full</p>
<p>and more</p>
<p>and it gets better !</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve lived 5 years &#8211; cost free !</p>
<p>utilities + school tax</p>
<p>Where was I on gravy train day at CountryWide</p>
<p>I should have taken out a mortgage I&#8217;d HAVE to believe the world was ending to do so !</p>
<p>in 2003</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>