about this blog
- Elizabeth MacDonald is the stocks editor for Fox Business Network. She is recognized as one of the top prize-winning business journalists in the country, and has received 14 awards, including the top prize in business journalism, the Gerald Loeb Award for Distinguished Business Journalism, and the Newswomen's Club of New York Front Page Award for Excellence in Investigative Journalism.
most popular posts
-
- There are no viewed posts at this time.
Greedom
Hey, why isn't Citi on or at the top of that list ? heh heh
Greedom
Well, if it were up to me, I'd vote Ms MacDonald as nominee for a Pulitzer on Explanatory Writing. I remember reading once of something Einstein said regarding 'special knowledge' required in a given discipline that only those who are highly functional in such a discipline can understand. Apparently Jung and Einstein hung out a good bit, Karl said Albert would go off to no end about mathematics "the poor man, he didn't understand that I had no clue what he was talking about" Until one day Albert asked HIM about the psyche. Having some fun with the tables turned, Einstein is reported to have responded that it is too bad that experts often can not communicate between each other in matters of specialized disciplines. THIS is why I think it's important when you have someone reporting who is thinking of the audience that is not capable of understanding the 'economic speak' - and is able to successfully distill the 'big picture' from an otherwise highly complicated discipline. I'm not an economist, I read what I can - and often find myself over my head, but this article, and the CDO article yesterday make it easy for anyone to understand what's going on as to the causal factors behind this credit/sub prime crisis/fallout. I do with 'tn' was spelled out there above, heh, 'could hit the 1 tn mark' I had to think, hmm - but TRILLION - is one value that perhaps needs to be amplified. Either way - NOT that I'm a big fan that one company, NewsCorp ends up owning so many media resources, BUT - SINCE NewsCorp owns WSJ and MarketWatch now, considering the value from these insights, I don't know why the articles are buried at foxbusiness.com. MarketWatch ran an article the other day 'shadow banking system at estimated 10 trillion' - reading the comments from that ? there were SO many thankyou(s) to 'this is the best article I've ever seen on MarketWatch' etc. I do say, articles such as what I see here in MacDonald's corner ought to be publicized more - they are on the same level - 40,000 foot view insights coupled with competence, data and understanding of the matters at hand, oh yeah, and real passion to illuminate the truth I think.
Greedom
I never see the FTC in any of the headlines and yet ? Seems in matters of consumer fraud, you'd think the FTC would have a laundry list of corporations and companies to investigate.
Greedom
I do say If US response to Iraq War was Shock and Awe Perhaps the Federal investigators response should be following this model. Just take out droves of unethical employees at financial institutions - hold them responsible - make an example - build a dedicated prison JUST for wall street. hmm- make the walls pink perhaps - no, green ? hmm - maybe red - red would be a good color to focus on. I find money - as I anticipate on my death bed, looking back - was a utility - a means of enhancing life. I think money works by a community participating in a common belief and faith infrastructure that says 'we all concur money will mean something as a token for commerce interchange(ability)'. Now, money is a tool given value ultimately by a participating culture or community. So... if you think you can pocket money ? you're REALLY saying - I BELIEVE in this culture, this 'shared meaning' as David Bohm points out culture is. By pocketing money, you are saying, I am a responsible participant in this 'game' in a Wittginsteinian sense - as his study of formal systems revealed every formal system meets criteria for being a 'game'. So, anyone who thinks they can 'rob a bank' or 'sift off the top from a hedge fund operation' or cash in on a sub prime loan commission all the way up to cashing in on a sub prime loan bundled as a CDO and sold off to some unsuspecting 3rd world bank bystander ? Is really, at the end of the day - robbing their OWN community. At 40 revolutions around the sun, I've concluded that crime is that which is simply disadvantageous to ones community. To take money, and think you can squirrel it away - is to mis-understand what money is, and what the purpose of money is. At BEST, money - that it CAN exist - is a sign there are civilized people. I question such actions as these thieves involved in sub prime mess, to bank robbers, it's ALL highly adolescent. it's ALL consisting of a mandate for quality of character in someone such that they don't realize or feel integrated into society. Somehow, yes, i'm suggesting there exists a sociopathy when it comes to matters of money robberies. From a bank heist to well - what do you CALL cooked books to hide some 279 million sifted from hedge funds BUT a bank heist as well ? I guess I'm trying to consolidate thoughts and ask ? Is ALL of this mess due to some sense of bankers or bank robbers developing a sociopathic platform for persona ? Where they don't have any problem with 'stealing' ? I find it surprising SO many 'executive' level folks are demonstrating adolescent behavior. All in all, I think human civilization will make it, hey, what kind of life would it be to live as if otherwise ? so in the case of the disconnected sociopathic adolescents we have here involved in community thievery - I'm jaw dropped on one hand, and on the other ? Challenged in trying to figure out how to prevent this from re-occurring. Bottom line, if people feel disconnected as a species, we'll have this exploiting each other. Perhaps our political leaders could offer up more integrative missions - ones that don't go by the name 'shock and awe' etc. how about Sort and Sift ? I suppose if we live disconnected geopolitically - as a single species, we can expect people to develop disconnected modalities for persona, and left unchecked, we'll have bank robberies, regardless of which side of the teller window they occur on I suppose. I have developed an argument PRO nuclear weapons that says, not on mutually assured destruction here, but that - BECAUSE of the threat of the fallout - which occurs regardless of nation state boundaries (the winds etc), no arbitrary abstract geo-spatial model for persona derivation is worth it. I see 'global economy' emerging, post Bretton Woods, I saw the ITO - the International Trade Organization, but that never was ratified, and we settled on World Trade. I see a world where the US Dollar isn't kingfish anymore - good example ? I see Vietnam the other day jack it's currency rates up 1% - and BAM - USD falls. Sure they'e at what 14% but- it's ALL interrelated. The healthy model would be to start adopting the term basket currency to get used to a single currency. I think somewhere down the road, a shift from nationalism to globalism will happen formally. I think in part ? I mean, what IS a terrorist ? Bush was able to push torture and skate Geneva Convention by stating these people belonged to no nation state. That was a sign to me that we're entering into a transitional period post nationalistic if you wish to call it that where we don't quite know WHAT we'll call a threatening force or action, if nationalism is gone. Well - enter stage left, 'terrorist' That is the term you will have when you have no nationalistic ground to peg someone. If we move to globalism ? Which we are, I think you have to explore new terms for an assailant. Pretty much, it's simply any non-nation state entity is the threat. BUT - globalism will sponsor no nationalism. So, as I like to say - remove the nation state ? and hey - THERE is your solution to 'terrorism' as ? no nation state ? no target anymore- amazing isn't it ? my point exactly. The rules have changed it's not the same it's all new players in a whole new ball game ! (The Goodbye Look- Donald Fagan) Either way - You can watch Back to the Future and examine a failed temporal model that is linear, heh, point being, remember the Iranian Terrorists scene ? in the VW bus ? Point there is 'terrorists' didn't just appear on the radar in 2001 - 9.11 And further, ALL you are really playing with regarding 'terrorist' by definition - according to Gonzalez and Bush - is a non-nationstate entity. Isn't it peculiar ? the non-nation state entities ? are defined by their attacks ON a nation-state ? the concept of a terrorist attacking a terrorist is non-sensical if you think about it by definition. we have Terrorism because we are in a transitional state POST nationalism, and once nationalism has transformed to globalism, as it already has on the financial markets, and global economy ? Terrorism will just 'go away', as there won't BE any nation state to attack anymore. Think about it. On that - Nationalism is fragmentary - as a model - and once you adhere to fragmentary thinking systems ? you can expect people to disconnect from society - to FRAGMENT the species experience. with that - you will HAVE things like the sub prime fallout - bank robberies - people that don't understand the species and genome is one. I always liked that line from Gandhi "I can not separate myself from the most wicked soul for humanity is but one" odd, I have SO many people tell me Gandhi was racist, and yet ? I derive so much meaning from that statement, I live by it. Oh well - Maybe patience is all that is needed for humanity long term. Maybe the entire species is in an adolescent stage ! could explain a lot !
Angry appraiser
SEC/FBI should drug/hair test the entire hedge fund industry. then audit them for tax fraud/evasion bet at least 50% are drug abusers. bet at least 99% arent paying their fair share in income tax. We havent even seen the tip of the corruption iceberg yet.
DrZoidberg
Angry Appraisuer posts above: ' Comment by Angry appraiser 2008-06-26 14:53:50 SEC/FBI should drug/hair test the entire hedge fund industry. then audit them for tax fraud/evasion bet at least 50% are drug abusers. bet at least 99% arent paying their fair share in income tax. We havent even seen the tip of the corruption iceberg yet. " make that JUST the FBI Remember, SEC and CIA are in bed together at times, and from anyone long term in FBI will tell you - CIA isn't to be relied upon (we all know that post Iraq heh), nor trusted (now now, Negroponte is to change all that ? )- and therefore - I wouldn't EVER want to see FBI and SEC together unless - it's near an end game and SEC was brought in at the end. Given choice to leave the kids at the FBI daycare or CIA daycare or SEC? Uh, I'd never leave the kids with the CIA or the SEC. Wow - carriage return limit - that's a new one !