June 18, 2008 5:34PM
Congressmen Call for Delay on Housing Bill
By Elizabeth MacDonald
A growing number of Congressmen are demanding that votes be delayed on the new $300 billion housing relief legislation until hearings are held into a controversial mortgage loan program at Countrywide Financial involving alleged preferential treatment given to elected officials.
Countrywide (CFC) officials allegedly gave preferential treatment in mortgage loans, including float-down interest rates and shaving of points, to a select group of VIPs that included both Sens. Kent Conrad [D-N.D.] and Chris Dodd [D-Conn.], both of whom have denied any wrongdoing. Countrywide’s controversial deals were given under the “Friends of Angelo” program, nicknamed after Countrywide chief executive Angelo Mozilo. Portfolio Magazine reported the allegations last week.
James Johnson, a former chief executive of Fannie Mae, resigned recently as an adviser to the presidential campaign of Sen. Barack Obama after the Wall Street Journal reported that Johnson received sweetheart loans from Countrywide. Johnson’s lawyer has said those loans were made on normal terms.
House and Senate rules bar members from knowingly receiving gifts worth $100 or more annually from companies that use registered lobbyists. Countrywide’s ethics code restricts executives, employees and board directors from improperly trying to influence government employees with money, gifts, loans, rewards, favors or anything of value.
The disclosures about the Countrywide program have sent members of Congress scrambling to defend themselves and assure voters that they did not receive preferential treatment in getting mortgages from Countrywide. Bank of America (BAC) is forging ahead to buy Countrywide in a deal now estimated to cost $3.3 bn. A special shareholder vote on its Countrywide purchase is scheduled for June 25.
Sen. Jim DeMint, [R-S.C.], has signaled he might try to block the housing measure due to the allegations.
“The housing bill has a multibillion-dollar taxpayer bailout for a company that reportedly gave preferential loans to members of Congress,” a spokesman quotes the Senator as saying. “This is exactly the type of thing Americans are sick of.”
Rep. Darrell Issa (R-) and Rep. Mark Souder also sent Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) a letter demanding hearings “on allegations that mortgage lenders may have made special deals with members of Congress,” noting that “prominent people,” including Senators Dodd and Conrad as well as “Fannie Mae CEOs Jim Johnson and Franklin Raines” allegedly received loans with preferential terms.
The two Congressmen are also asking that Rep. Waxman use his influence to “stop any legislation bailing out mortgage lenders until all tainted individuals have recused themselves, and the legislation has been examined and declared free of any undue influence.”
In an exclusive interview on Fox Business, Rep. Issa demanded that the new $300 billion housing bill, which aims to help distressed homeowners and provide some relief to lenders, “be scrubbed” to ensure no conflicts of interest exist.
Rep. Issa was notably vocal earlier this year at a Congressional hearing looking into lucrative compensation given to bank executives at a time when taxpayers are losing their homes during the housing crisis. Testifying at the hearing were former Merrill Lynch top executive Stanley O’Neal, former Citigroup head Charles Prince, and Countrywide’s chairman and chief executive Mozilo.
In a pointed exchange, Issa had said at the time that “this is a hearing in search of bad guys. Are there bad guys in front of me? I’m not seeing it,” adding that the executives suffered alongside shareholders as the value of their stock in their companies plunged as well, despite the fact that these executives have been criticized for mismanaging their companies.
Rep. Issa and Rep. Souder addressed this issue in their letter, which noted that the loans, if true, “seem more egregious than the large compensation packages” the companies paid their CEOs and “deserve to be investigated with the same zeal as was the link of executive pay to the mortgage crisis.”
Similarly, Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) has called for hearings to determine whether members received “preferential treatment” with their mortgages “while millions of hardworking Americans struggle to repay their mortgage debts and cope with $4 [per] gallon gasoline and soaring foods prices,” he noted in an open letter to Congressional colleagues.
Hensarling said he would request the hearings in a follow-up letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).
Newly released financial disclosure reports show at least a dozen House members also hold loans issued by Countrywide, according to the Washington, D.C. newspaper Roll Call. However, Roll Call is finding that most of the loans were given to these elected officials prior to their winning their elections to Congress.



Comment by Paul
Jun 18th, 2008 at 7:28 pm
Where does HSBC UK, whom I believe are the “Owners of Countryside”, appear in this “Discussion”?
Comment by Paul
Jun 18th, 2008 at 7:33 pm
Why does moderation have to apply? Why not Commonsense! we are not “Terrorist’s” but no doubt by the using the “Latter Word” I will be “Investigated” as a supporter of “Free Speech”, without “Censorship” by whichever “Power Rule’s”.
Just answer the “Question”!
Comment by Sal from NY
Jun 18th, 2008 at 9:06 pm
If it happened at Country Wide, who knows where else it happened. I bet a lot of politicians got favorable treatment and are shocked to find this special treatment. I find this hard to believe. Just look at their saying on oil. “When you increase the supply the prices won’t drop” that sure has not happened to the housing market. They maybe live in a fantasy world at Washington DC and what effects the average American surely does not affect them.
Comment by DrDetroit
Jun 19th, 2008 at 3:30 am
I love people that say “It’s MY money, but… uh, yeah, that’s right, it’s OUR mutual participation into a common share belief and faith that it’s actually worth anything.”
Took me until late 30’s to figure that out.
Speaking of numbers - anyone that has done even a BIT of work in mathematics - will come across numeric base systems. In base 10 ? sure, 2,000 looks pretty ! in base 9 ? no, it’s not so pretty. Point being, year 2000 ‘psychologically’ - MY view- and I’ve not met a person YET that got this - is MERELY a celebration of base 10.
So, flipping the dial on a coffee break today - granted I work at home - I come across fox Business news going “And thank GOD we’re holding at 12,000 today” ok - maybe God was left out, I’m sure the editors want to keep that played down - but promoted strong in every other way - HOWEVER - 12,000 is MERELY ‘clean’ in base ten.
There is nothing special about base 10 - it would be inappropriate to assign meaning through base - I would think evaluating the DOW Jones would be through examining what had high volume, what was abnormally low, etc, the number is JUST the number, it’s ARBITRARY whether it looks pretty in base 10, or base 7 (octal) -
I mean - 100 in octal looks pretty but you know ? it’s 49 in base 10.
I think it’s sloppy thinking to forget base is arbitrary when assessing value - SURE there is a psychological component, but anyone who would BUY something based on base ? should have their head examined.
“Look honey, it’s ONLY $200,000″ hmm
Now, the home was PROBABLY WORTH $143,238 THEN inflated if via a WaMu appraiser - and THEN rounded up….
The danger in thinking VALUES and the numeration place value extended as nuance through choice of base ? Sheesh, theoretically you could make everything $9.99 and just change the base.
Oh wait, on that note, that just makes it so the price is the same, and the base changes !