about this blog
- Elizabeth MacDonald is the stocks editor for Fox Business Network. She is recognized as one of the top prize-winning business journalists in the country, and has received 14 awards, including the top prize in business journalism, the Gerald Loeb Award for Distinguished Business Journalism, and the Newswomen's Club of New York Front Page Award for Excellence in Investigative Journalism.
most popular posts
-
- There are no viewed posts at this time.
cbk
Wow ! these people are just one big mafia ! no wonder they wont sell --the sharholders be damned ! i would love to sit on the compensation committe and divy -up the compensation pie!!!
John
Google can't buy Yahoo! due to anti-trust concerns.
steveo
Helping America steel is big bid the market rush is marking the way for steel buying benazza as the money is right and we must mack use of majeure bulk hails in temptation for to sell old dollar and mack it new again from recognizing value derelict cars and any other mess after bad storm season for steel commodities will help big play on high flux in world markets developmentation is waiting for the leader USA to start the trend ! for the right stuff to work at a time when in Bulk for to help is help both way's.
nathania
I don't see how google has any reason to buy yahoo. They dominate the search market share (both search queries and search advertising). Plus page views for all of google sites surpassed yahoo sites last month. I don't see that trend reversing. I think ms. Macdonald's insight into the financial ties of yahoo's board speaks. Volumes about their resistance to microsoft's offer. Having said that, I think the cultures of microsoft's and yahoo make them a poor match. And it continues to baffle me why traders and analysts want to see this deal go down. While their might be an initial monetary boost, I over time I think it would give google even more market share. Carl ICANN may make a pretty penny from his proxy board but it's google's page and bring that will be laughing all the way to the bank.
Smithy
nathania : "I don’t see how google has any reason to buy yahoo" If Google doesn't have any reason to buy Yahoo, how come Google CEO, Eric Schmidt, made a secret call to Yahoo CEO, Jerry Yang, and suggested they crave up the search market, in a clear attempt to monolpolize the search market snd deny consumers any choice? In fact the DOJ is looking into this outrageous act by the Google CEO, even as we speak.
DrDetroit
Note to administrator for comments: Reply functionality would be welcomed. But in reply to above - Smithy, There is no more Justice Department after Monica Goodling's hirings and firings. But more importantly - as if there were a DOJ that wasn't limp, indeed, they could possibly stop TXU from merging on Wall Street. Google is already testing ads on Yahoo. The ads make google. I'm not sure why you find google 'communist' - if you do your research, the NSA funded google from the beginning at Stanford, then again, the NSA funds a LOT of work at Stanford. Google in my view salvaged all the pre year 2000 'Click the moving monkey ads' and consolidated it all into a very tightly controlled search engine/advertising network. Yahoo COULD probably do 'ok' if it maxed out its advertising as Google does. Microsoft started riding the coattails of Google a couple years back, I pay into both myself. Google still offers the best results, although I'm NEVER happy paying over $1 for a 'click' someone, anyone happens to make on my link. To that, I think Google's REAL value to people is far far far less than the company makes off with from their customers. I've been using computers on a daily basis since the mid 1970's as a child, at that time it was mainframe granted, and networking, ArpaNet was barely past hotel meeting arrangements via Request For Comments, however witnessing trends, and how the micro streamlined into Microsoft and *nix, then all turned into thin clients. I used Google with great happiness when it came out, it simply worked well. I MAY use Yahoo search occasionally, perhaps if I don't want to have my search added to my Google search analytics pegged to my IP, that's about it. Maybe if I can't find something via Google, I'll try Yahoo, rarely anything better comes up. So, Yahoo and everyone else in my view takes back seat to Google for a search engine. Yahoo is dead in that regards, but it lives on with - as you said - email users such as yourself, who rightfully so perhaps don't want to be cross-marketed ads by using gmail. Yahoo has REAL networks of users - that is real. Yahoo doesn't make #1 for search engine portal though. Yahoo auctions ? not sure about, Yahoo chat ? my god, I checked that out once, I'm STILL in therapy from the trauma incurred- it's that bad and that was JUST a political chat room. I think Google wants to either USE Yahoo to run its ads - come on, Google even wants your grandmothers website to run ads - and they probably already have her. Google makes it VERY easy for common end users to become billboard space for their advertising. I truly believe this is Google's interest in Yahoo. So, unless Yahoo gets agressive and follows Microsoft in hopes of trying to cash in on this distributed ad network model Google has made such a success ? They aren't going anywhere. In that Google already has started running ads through Yahoo, that's my basis for intuiting that Google is exploring Yahoo. Microsoft's ONLY interest in my book HAS to be the same interest, the wanton of Yahoo's existing real user base, loyal or just there for free email or file sharing, to extend MS's ad network. All in all I still think it's kind of silly, all you have to do is start paying Google or Microsoft AS an advertiser for you to realize how askew the pricing really is. If I owned Google stock, my god, you know each time you click an ad on Google ? they're making sometimes OVER $1 ? 250 Clicks ad up - and that's virtually funny money. On the flip side, I have to PAY Google for when people click my ads, so if I have an angry consumer out there clicking away ? It really can cost me hundreds a month. Sure Google has means to watch high click aggregates on an IP, but you know ? they sure never report what those limit are. Myself, I could care less about who buys Yahoo, if anything, they somewhat lose for not attempting to make the best use of their own company. What kind of an exit strategy is it to be bought ?