Emac's Stock Watch | Fox Business
  • May 29, 2008 09:17 AM EDT by Elizabeth MacDonald

    Beware this Hot China Stock: China Finance Online

    It's one of the hottest momentum stocks in China today.

    It's China Finance Online (JRJC), a Beijing company that's due out with a profit report today that Wall Street has been anticipating for weeks now, as its American depositary shares soar ever higher in Nasdaq trading in anticipation of yet another rosy earnings outlook.

    China Finance has been riding the stock mania that's got indices on the mainland in bubble territory. Investors in China are pouring into stocks, grabbing returns while they can as they fear the Chinese government will punt on providing sufficient coverage for health care and retirement. China Finance is perched atop that wave.

    The company purports to sell the best in financial information online, with news flashes and updates to investors on the mainland and abroad so they can get in on the action in China's stocks too. Its website says it sells users "software tools" to "analyze financial and listed company information" on all sorts of stocks, bonds, and mutual funds.

    Not so fast. There is a growing chorus of critics who say this stock is way too frothy. My read of its numbers shows it's been bleeding losses for some time now. It's got a negative 16% profit margin, a negative 6% return on equity, just a 3% return on assets, a tiny $5.7m in cash flow over the last 12 months on just $25m in trailing twelve month revenues.

    This one might be a trade not an investment.

    Here's more analysis from Citron Research. See below. I tried to do what Citron did with China Finance Online's website and met with the same results. Now I'm waiting for the lame telemarketing spam to hit my emailbox as well as arrive in snail mail. Why oh why do I do these things:

    Folks, the company sells a group of newsletters to Chinese stock speculators with names like "Quick Profits" and "Storm" and "Stock Radar." They sell by telemarketing, and they have plans to increase their telemarketing staff again next year.

    If you hit the "Purchase" or "Free Trial" buttons, you can't even order online. The form sends an email to a telemarketer who will presumably respond to your request and try to upsell you something.

    The reality is there are hundreds of competing stock commentary publications in China. This has gone from silliness to nonsense. The chatrooms calling this the "Bloomberg of China" are well......out to lunch.

    Now Breen Murray has raised its target from $25 to $35 while cautioning about the need for a "market correction" due to volatility.  What has changed since Breen put out its $25 target, which was a raise from $17 just the week before, except the momentum in the stock?  Did Breen's analyst fail to understand this company as the "Bloomberg of China" until the stock price told him?

    The JP Morgan analyst put a $29 target on this company as of Dec 08, with a very detailed revenue projection based on the company's plans. Will he have the integrity to call a "sell on valuation" now, or will he raise his target because of the stock price?

    After breaking its IPO price of $13 right out of the gate in late 2004, and languishing in low single digits for well over two years, this tiny company which publishes investment guides for Chinese stocks has this year rocketed to a 1000% gain on the mania surrounding the China stock market.

    Most recently, shares rocketed higher on the purchase of a Hong Kong brokerage firm for about $3m. Recent momentum trading has now driven this company with revenues about $5m or $6m per quarter from newsletter subscriptions above an $800m dollar market cap.

    Citron observes that management has not been able to execute over the past three years during the biggest boom in the China market while positioning themselves in a space with a low barrier to entry. We acknowledge they have now gotten their revenues up to $5m per qtr. But we doubt Bloomberg is jealous.

    Now we are not issuing a wholesale critique of China stocks--a lot of them have some impressive growth rates to show for their skyrocketing valuations. It is just important to decipher what is a bubble and what is value.

    Think of JRJC as Thestreet.com for China, yet even in the tremendous market boom the company was only able to generate $7.4m in revenue in all of 2006, and projects about $20m for the current year.

    Comparatively speaking TSCM generated $57m in revenue and has a market cap of about third this name.

    This has become a quintessential example of the uncritical cheerleading that Wall Street has become so famous for--and that has burned investors. So, don't be surprised if Chinese stocks catch a cold and JRJC gets the flu.

RandomWalker

Elizabeth: A correction to my earlier comment: projected revenue of $58.5m is for the whole year of 2008. One more comment: I agree with you on the Bloomberg analogy, but wouldn't call company's telemarketing effort a "spam". More than anything, marketing is probably the most important aspect of a business in China and JRJC seems to excel in that.

May 29, 2008 at 11:53 pm

RandomWalker

Please use the latest and correct facts! The second part of the article sounds like it was copied from an article written six months ago and the earning power of China Finance Online has increased tremendously since then! According to the earning report issued yesterday, the revenue for Q1 2008 has risen to $11.06m instead of $5m, and projects to be around $58.5m instead of $20m as you said in the article! Those are big errors, intentional or unintentional! The company has $80m+ in cash and expects to earn $1.09-1.26 per share. The forward p/e is around 20, not unreasonable for a China company that's in a fast-growing market. Plus the company owes a brokerage license in Hong Kong and may get one in mainland China as well. Anyway readers please read the latest quarterly report and conference call transcript. --- an investor who is living in China

May 29, 2008 at 11:23 pm

Ching

Recent momentum trading has now driven this company with revenues about $5m or $6m per quarter from newsletter subscriptions above an $800m dollar market cap. 460m market cap on 12+m rev per quarter. Look at new guidance and recent earnings You are a fraud or very bad at what you do

May 29, 2008 at 9:07 pm

Macaron

This article is a reprint of the article on Citron Research. Moreover, lead generation practices are common in the US with many healthcare companies, cable providers, etc. It's a common methodology used to guide people who may not really understand the product they are buying. Upsell to another product? It's capitalism, so I don't understand the negative language - you try to sell more, that's it. Instead of looking at trailing profit margins, and other items, it makes more sense to look at forward looking items like increased subscriber growth. Yes, there was a writedown for 2007 regarding a prior investment but why don't you look at the deferred revenues on the balance sheet? Or perhaps you don't even know how to read one. People on Wall Street aren't that stupid, least of all Julian Robertson of Tiger management.

May 29, 2008 at 7:20 pm

Kevin A. McCauley

As always, first rate reporting and analysis. You are my hero. Kevin

May 29, 2008 at 4:18 pm

about this blog

  • Elizabeth MacDonald is the stocks editor for Fox Business Network. She is recognized as one of the top prize-winning business journalists in the country, and has received 14 awards, including the top prize in business journalism, the Gerald Loeb Award for Distinguished Business Journalism, and the Newswomen's Club of New York Front Page Award for Excellence in Investigative Journalism.

most popular posts