<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Market Regulators, Read This Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/05/15/market-regulators-read-this-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/05/15/market-regulators-read-this-now/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:57:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: w.  leather</title>
		<link>http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/05/15/market-regulators-read-this-now/comment-page-1/#comment-1433</link>
		<dc:creator>w.  leather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 17:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/05/15/market-regulators-read-this-now/#comment-1433</guid>
		<description>Again ,  I  say  get  out  of  paper  assets.

Buy  Gold  1  oz.  maple  leafs ,  krugerands.

Buy  Silver  10  oz.  bars

Now  is  not  the  time  to  risk  your  money..

get  back  to  basics,and  saftey ..  Gold  and  Silver</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again ,  I  say  get  out  of  paper  assets.</p>
<p>Buy  Gold  1  oz.  maple  leafs ,  krugerands.</p>
<p>Buy  Silver  10  oz.  bars</p>
<p>Now  is  not  the  time  to  risk  your  money..</p>
<p>get  back  to  basics,and  saftey ..  Gold  and  Silver</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joey45</title>
		<link>http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/05/15/market-regulators-read-this-now/comment-page-1/#comment-1432</link>
		<dc:creator>joey45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 14:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/05/15/market-regulators-read-this-now/#comment-1432</guid>
		<description>One thing that clearly stands out, at least to me, is that the very core of the &quot;Free Market&quot; operational model is at a point of crisis, and now, everyone knows it.  And, it is an election year...and the candidates all know it, too.
1.  A phrase such as &quot;Well-regulated free market&quot; is beginning to sound like an oxymoron.
2.  After what you&#039;ve just reported, it appears as if the &#039;fox&#039; is giving the &#039;chickens&#039; a good word in the ears of the &#039;farmer,&#039; (who might otherwise decide to butcher them all), in exchange for a votive offering of a free chicken for his dining pleasure!
3.  How do we escape from a situation, given the lack of regulation of the &#039;fox,&#039; where conflict of interest seems to be unavoidable?
4.  Given the situation described, how does an investor justify risking a lot of money on the advice of analyst, or group of them, having done no more &#039;due diligence&#039; than you describe?

Elizabeth, now that the &#039;foxes&#039; have been exposed, how could this impasse be escaped, and still retain a free market?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that clearly stands out, at least to me, is that the very core of the &#8220;Free Market&#8221; operational model is at a point of crisis, and now, everyone knows it.  And, it is an election year&#8230;and the candidates all know it, too.<br />
1.  A phrase such as &#8220;Well-regulated free market&#8221; is beginning to sound like an oxymoron.<br />
2.  After what you&#8217;ve just reported, it appears as if the &#8216;fox&#8217; is giving the &#8216;chickens&#8217; a good word in the ears of the &#8216;farmer,&#8217; (who might otherwise decide to butcher them all), in exchange for a votive offering of a free chicken for his dining pleasure!<br />
3.  How do we escape from a situation, given the lack of regulation of the &#8216;fox,&#8217; where conflict of interest seems to be unavoidable?<br />
4.  Given the situation described, how does an investor justify risking a lot of money on the advice of analyst, or group of them, having done no more &#8216;due diligence&#8217; than you describe?</p>
<p>Elizabeth, now that the &#8216;foxes&#8217; have been exposed, how could this impasse be escaped, and still retain a free market?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betsy</title>
		<link>http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/05/15/market-regulators-read-this-now/comment-page-1/#comment-1431</link>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 22:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/05/15/market-regulators-read-this-now/#comment-1431</guid>
		<description>Wow. This is sad. Scarry and sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. This is sad. Scarry and sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vaughn</title>
		<link>http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/05/15/market-regulators-read-this-now/comment-page-1/#comment-1430</link>
		<dc:creator>Vaughn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 00:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/05/15/market-regulators-read-this-now/#comment-1430</guid>
		<description>Reforming rating agencies is easier than thought. Just treat rating agencies as professional, like lawyers, accountants, doctors, etc.,and make them assume malpractice liabilities.

Get rid of first amendment protection for rating agencies. If rating agencies get paid for ratings, they shall be deprived the protection under the first amendment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reforming rating agencies is easier than thought. Just treat rating agencies as professional, like lawyers, accountants, doctors, etc.,and make them assume malpractice liabilities.</p>
<p>Get rid of first amendment protection for rating agencies. If rating agencies get paid for ratings, they shall be deprived the protection under the first amendment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lincoln</title>
		<link>http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/05/15/market-regulators-read-this-now/comment-page-1/#comment-1425</link>
		<dc:creator>lincoln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emac.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2008/05/15/market-regulators-read-this-now/#comment-1425</guid>
		<description>Emac strikes again. This is good, informed reporting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emac strikes again. This is good, informed reporting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>